Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Details to follow


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Joe Eszterhas Releases Audio of Mel Gibson Rant | Main | Russian Bog-Mummy From WWII? Yes Please »
April 19, 2012

Does The War On Dogs Actually Move Votes?


There's good eatin' by the haunches.

Maybe.

The respective base of each side is locked up. What remains is those folks in the middle who claim to care but who can’t be bothered to read about politics and policy. So what ends up influencing the decisions of these low-information voters? All kinds of factors, including appearances . . .
The looks of political candidates are a key factor influencing voters, a phenomenon identified by a number of scholars in recent years. Now, a new study by MIT political scientists adds to this body of research by detailing which types of citizens are most influenced by candidate appearances, and why: The tendency is most prevalent among low-information voters who watch a lot of television.

Using data from the 2006 U.S. Senate and governors’ races, the study shows that for every 10-point increase in the advantage a candidate has when rated by voters on his or her looks, there will be a nearly 5 percent increase in the vote for that candidate by the uninformed voters who are most firmly planted on their couches. Yet that same advantage in loo ks is worth only about a 1 percent increase among low-information voters who watch little television.

The dueling dog stories represent each campaign making Hail Mary passes to reach these low-information voters.

Streiff agrees with Geraghty.

Some of the small things will wind up mattering. You don't know which ones will matter, so might as well make mention of them all.

@onefinejay on Twitter put it well, rebutting a No Fun Allowed prig's assertion that we shouldn't waste our time on, um, enjoyable things.

we'll have a few laughs, affect the zeitgeist a little, and keep being happy warriors. We'll win.

GMan, posting in the comments yesterday, quoted Alinksy's Rules for Radicals:

RULE 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counter attack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.

RULE 6: A good tactic is one that your people enjoy. If your people aren’t having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.

Reaching low-information voters isn't the only goal. Another goal is solidarity within the cause.

We just exited a long, bruising primary, in which some won and some lost, and in which a lot of insults flew, and a lot of anger was vented.

Stuff like this dog meme creates, unavoidably, a shared cultural reference among us. Just like two Children of the Eighties may find a rapport by discussing their past love of Dark Tower, so too can political partisans find a bit of human connection over silly jokes about Obama, Devourer of Dogs.

Right now -- as anger over the primary remains raw -- stuff like Hilary Rosen's attack on Ann Romney -- and our collective defense of her -- and Jim Treacher's dogged research (ahem) helps unify, emotionally, a movement which cannot and never will be completely unified in terms of policy preference.

That's useful.

Plus, you know, eating dogs is a ghastly practice of foreign barbarians. As the Obama campaign struggles to portray Romney as a weirdo and The Other, we can always note Dude Ate a F***in' Dog.

Moe Lane wonders what form Obama's next attempt to portray Romney as The Other will take -- but questions whether such an attempt is advisable.



digg this
posted by Ace at 12:14 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
m: "Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson ... received a B.A., ..."

rhennigantx: "Jews give 110% Posted by: I used to have a differ ..."

Martini Farmer: "Morning peeps _________ [i]"My problem is your ..."

Peter North: "[i]nailed it Posted by: Don Black at March 19, 20 ..."

Don Black: "nailed it ..."

screaming in digital: ""My problem is your view has the First Amendment h ..."

Village Idiot's Apprentice: ""cool- like a deepwater drilling rig" Yup, that ..."

Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden: "[i] Wait, by that syllogism, wouldn't all gay dud ..."

m: "164 Have a great day, everyone. May there be a ..."

Village Idiot's Apprentice: "Be safe, Salty! ..."

Don Black: ">THEN.....I took three heavy fishing weights on th ..."

Aetius451AD: "He sucks cock by choice. He is Average Joe. Po ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64