« Don Cheadle: Not An Idiot | Main | Confirmed: MSNBC Will Report Anything Appearing on The Daily Kos »
April 05, 2012

Marco Rubio: It's Time To Concede That Mitt Romney Is Our Candidate

Via Hot Air, the Shark Tank reported the statement.

“I actually think we’re going to have a very good nominee. I think Mitt Romney’s going to be the next president of the United States. And by their own admission, the folks running against Mitt Romney have admitted that they cannot win the primary, that the only way they can win is a floor fight at the convention, which I think would set us back in terms of our goal of replacing Barack Obama.

“So I do believe it’s time now to concede that Mitt Romney has won the Republican nomination, that he’s going to be the Republican nominee, and that if we all get behind him he will be the next president of the United States.”

The way he phrased it, it's not necessarily an instruction to Gingrich or Santorum. It seems like more, "We should all concede this."

For what it's worth, I don't think politicians should say this. It's counterproductive. Every statement like this makes people want to dig in their heels more.

People should just be permitted to come to terms with this on their own schedule.

It's one thing to think you lost a big game. If you think you were outplayed, you accept it.

If you decide that the refs took the game from you, now you have a grievance, and a sense of unfairness, and an anger towards The Whole Corrupt System.

Romney supporters should be very wary of giving anti-Romney Republicans that sense of grievance.

"We lost" is one thing; "We wuz robbed!" is another. And the whole Narrative among some conservatives (yes, conservatives have Narratives too) is that a hostile and corrupt power structure has denied them a great true-blue conservative candidate who'd have an advantage in a general election, which turns out to be, improbably, either Santorum or Gingrich.

Anyone believing "We wuz robbed! It's a rigged game!" by November will probably just stay home and not vote (and usher Obama into an End of America presidential term), so it is imperative to not do anything to provoke feelings of disenfranchisement.

Those feelings are already there. No point throwing gas on that particular fire.

I believe Romney is indeed inevitable. So let him be inevitable. Let the inevitability take care of itself.

Rather than make the case for Romney in this way, why not make the affirmative case for him?

He actually does have some good things going for him.

My own experience with coming over to Romney's side is this: Once you get past hating his guts, you kind of... like him.

Is he a great candidate? No, but he's quite good. Look at him again, just on a superficial basis: What's here that you wouldn't want in a candidate?

Is he ultra-conservative? No, but I do believe he is conservative. And while people largely ignore this, he has endorsed the Ryan Budget. Democrats are currently trying to make that a central issue in this campaign, Romney's "extremism" in embracing this budget.

And yet embrace it he did.

I'm not going to nominate him for a Medal of Honor, but it's a positive sign, surely.

But people need the space and time to discover that for themselves. Pushing them towards that conclusion only encourages further resistance.

No one, especially those who wave a Gadsden Flag, wants to be pushed towards something.

I always say this: It's a standard principle of persuading someone, or, frankly, of conning them, to let the target (or, um, "mark") come to the conclusion himself.

That way, he has ownership of it. It wasn't forced upon him. He put together the bits of data and made a conclusion himself.

Now I'm talking about conning people, and that's not really a good thing to be discussing here, but the fact is, con artists employ this principle because they know it's how people actually think.

People are rankled that Romney is likely to win. They're comparing him, I believe, not to Santorum and Gingrich, but to hypothetical candidates they would really prefer, for whom Santorum and Gingrich are substitute place-holders only for basis of comparison.

And when you compare Romney to Your Absolute Favorite Choice, hey, he kind of sucks.

But that'll be ending soon, because the calender compels it. The real choice will soon (probably) be between Mitt Romney and Barack Hussein Obama.

I think that's a pretty easy and painless call. I am not worried that my judgement on that will be rejected by a significant number of conservative voters.

Let people get there on their own. Most will get there.



digg this
posted by Ace at 03:54 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Cats [/b] [/i] [/s] [/u]: "I like cats, but I wish that they would stop killi ..."

Slapweasel, (Cold1), ([b]T[/b]) Baseball Nut [/i] [/b] [/u] [/s]: ""[i]Bwhahahahahahaha. Classic example of male mem ..."

goon : "I like cats, but I wish that they would stop killi ..."

goon : "So, okay then, if I take a picture of a snake livi ..."

CatchThirtyThr33: "Speaking of thought crimes: recently TSA has taken ..."

JuJuBee, just generally being shamey: "That hanging dog thing happens more than it should ..."

goon : "Well, okay then, if you're going to rescue someone ..."

Gumdrop Gorilla: "106 103 100 I was never banned. I got pissed at ..."

CatchThirtyThr33: "Hit Lost Maples State Park in the Hill Country of ..."

goon : "That video of the mob scene, compared to the dog s ..."

Margarita DeVille: "93 there is a right way and a wrong way to adopt a ..."

The bibulant logprof: "103 100 I was never banned. I got pissed at ace. ..."

Recent Entries
Search


MuNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat
Archives
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64