Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« Movie Review: Atlas Shrugged, Part 1 | Main | Overnight Open Thread »
May 09, 2011

Boehner Claims He Wants Trillions, Not Billions, In Cuts In Exchange For Debt-Ceiling Hike
Update: John Kyl of AZ Says "I'd Like Six Trillion, Please"

My first reaction is cynical, but what does he gain by pure posturing? What point is there to setting up expectations, if he already intends to sell out completely?

If I credit him for having half a brain (I do), then I have to think this is genuine -- or at least his negotiating position will start from the trillions range.

So, that's better than before, when we started at a paltry $30 billion. But will he leverage that greater starting position into a much better gain? Or give it mostly away at the end again?

There is room for some hope; the public is unambiguously against raising the debt ceiling. So our position here is strong. I thought our position with the shutdown wasn't all that bad either, and I guess the leadership disagreed. But how can they disagree here?

Setting up a mark, at least.

The proposals Boehner laid out in New York were bold in how far they tacked to the right and how high he set the bar for spending cuts. For example, under Boehner’s vision, Republicans would have to find more than $2 trillion in cuts if they wanted to raise the debt ceiling by that amount through 2012, according to the Treasury department’s estimates on the debt limit. But Republicans could also go for a more incremental increase in the debt ceiling, coupling that with a smaller offsetting cut in spending. Boehner’s preference is for immediate cuts, not promises to pare back spending in the future or set triggers for deficit reduction.

His preference? That should be more than a mere preference. Future promises count for nothing, exactly nothing, as we've seen time and time again.

But by mentioning “trillions” in long term cuts, Boehner is clearly putting entitlement reform in play — including Medicare — since it would be near impossible to cut trillions without affecting entitlement spending.

Meh, Obama already proposed some death-panels reductions there.

I point that out because it seems to me the press is always eager to push "Republicans suggest cutting Medicare" but not so eager to note "Obama suggests cutting Medicare."

Six Trillion Now? Per the update at Hot Air. Kyl's more forward leaning. Maybe he can put some starch in Boehner's spine this time around.

A trillion here, a trillion there, and pretty soon you're talking real money.

“You’re going to have to have significant upfront cuts,” he told reporters Monday. “You’re going to have to have significant constraints on future spending. You’re going to have to have an agreement on the next several years of budget numbers so we know exactly what those are. I think there will be other constraints on spending – there is more than one way to do that, I think there are several things that might be done.”…

“I think there will be some Medicare reform; it probably won’t satisfy Republicans in terms of what we think is necessary,” he said. “But I think it’s pretty difficult for the Democrats to simply take it all off the table.”

Not really that difficult. As easy as saying "no."

The only way to win is if Republicans are serious about not raising the debt ceiling unless Democrats come to terms.

If you make a threat, but your opponent doesn't believe you, it really adds nothing at all to your negotiating position. In fact, it may even hurt you, as he smells weakness and desperation in the threat.

Republicans have to be prepared to do what they were not willing to do before: Just walk away.

Okay that use of "just walk away" is almost completely the opposite of what I mean, but I don't care.

I just mean we really need our caucus led by The Lord Humungous. He knows what the hell he's doing.

digg this
posted by Ace at 08:00 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
whig: "If you can't stand in front of it and defend it, y ..."

fd: "I hooked Mrs fd's old cassette / 8-track / tuner c ..."

whig: "241 whig Thanks! Posted by: NaCly Dog Savin ..."

John Drake Is Now Rounding The East Coast Of The Caspian Sea: "@235 Clint Eastwood bby The Gorillaz is great, as ..."

Notorious BFD: "[i]Rick Beato interviews *the* go to live performa ..."

[/i][/s][/b][/u]Oddbob: "My dad was something of an audiophile, something I ..."

Joe Mannix (Not a cop!): "Links do not cut it. Possession of the data is whe ..."

Smell the Glove: "@235 Clint Eastwood bby The Gorillaz is great, as ..."

JackStraw: ">>Copyright restrictions and YouTube make getting ..."

Ju: ""The idea makes an interesting case for predestina ..."

NaCly Dog: "whig Thanks! ..."

NaCly Dog: "whig I'll look into it. Links do not cut it ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64