Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups






















« A Year Later, Opinion Is Still Strong Against ObamaCare | Main | Is This Something? »
March 23, 2011

Speaking of Partisan Games on Matters of War: Gingrich Flip-Flops on Libya

I know there are some conservatives who have derided Obama for failing to lead in Libya, when a judicious application of Tomahawk missiles would have permitted the already-advancing rebels to swarm into Tripoli.

I know there are some conservatives who feel Obama is was basically acting properly by not intervening -- they take a "let them sort it out" position. They may criticize Obama for ancillary stuff (like issuing tough-guy bluster like "Qadaffy must go," then going golfing), but they believe that non-intervention is the correct policy, and have been consistent in this from the beginning.

Both of these positions are respectable (I think) and both have a good pedigree in the conservative movement. For every interventionist, there is a noninterventionist.

There is a one-sentence sum-up that everyone agrees on as foreign policy: "We must promote liberty and justice and defend the national interest, but we must not be the world's policeman or be drawn into bloody foreign adventures."

Everyone agrees with that, because it sort of says both everything and nothing at all. The real question in foreign intervention comes down, of course, to which of those two ideas, separated by that mischievously meaningful "but," do you most agree with?

Everyone agrees with that statement, but that's meaningless. The question is which part of it do you nod more vigorously along with.

I know where McCain and Lindsey Graham stand -- they are hawks and eager for foreign intervention. (Too eager, I think.) And I know where Rand Paul stands -- like his father, he is a skeptic of intervention.

I can speak politely with either camp. I may think either is wrong (or too ideological or not "flexible" and nuanced enough or whatever) but I wouldn't say any of those men is insincere.

But what is disrespectable and dishonorable, to me, is simply taking a position opposite whatever Obama is doing at the moment. That is just as much a hypocritical partisan game as what Johnny Come Lately military interventionists Chris Matthews and Joan Walsh are doing.

What is Newt's real position? I do not see any editing in these video clips, so I don't think these clips misrepresent his words. (We'll have to see, though.)

But it is unserious and partisan and cynical to urge muscular interventionism when Obama was sitting back and doing nothing but suddenly urging sitting back and doing nothing when Obama opts for airstrikes.

There was in fact a changed situation here -- 16 days ago the rebels just needed some airstrikes to take out Qadaffy's tanks and artillery and jets and they would have taken the whole country. At this point, the rebels may or may not win, even with Qadaffy's war machinery taken away from him.

But I don't hear Newt making that distinction, or saying that Obama let the situation shift in such a way as to now make intervention futile and therefore foolish. What I hear him saying is now that Obama's ordering airstrikes that he actually wouldn't have intervened before.

Which is the exact opposite of what he said 16 days ago.

This illustrates perfectly my basic problem with Newt Gingrich -- I just don't trust him. He is very clever at being clever, but beneath all that cleverness, what is real? What is genuine?

Is everything a game? Everything positioning for political advantage?

I do not know how Gingrich would respond to this -- I imagine he'll have to within the next few days.

It remains possible that there is deceptive editing here -- this video is offered by ThinkProgress. It is possible there is important context left out.

But, that said: I cannot easily imagine what context might reconcile these statements into something that looks like policy rather than political posturing.



digg this
posted by Ace at 02:20 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Senator Larry Craig, idly tapping foot: "Margin is wider. The Tractor Supply picture wasn't ..."

[i]Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM)[/b][/i][/s][/u]: " In an ironic twist, the Asian ATC In the pictur ..."

weft cut-loop[/i][/b] [/s]: "[i]Earlier this week, the FAA announced it has exc ..."

LRob in OK: "Careful, MW - that's an impressive resume, especia ..."

SFGoth: "In Bulgaria and Korea, nodding the head means "no" ..."

Notorious BFD: "I vote for icebergs. ..."

Kindltot: "[i]Check the ONT for any new tattoos. God only kno ..."

[i]Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM)[/b][/i][/s][/u]: " Those Blue Angels passes -- were those folks on ..."

Dave in Fla: "Margin is wider. The Tractor Supply picture wasn't ..."

Some Garbage Rat: "Is it possible to defuse a diffuse bomb? Hard to f ..."

18-1: "Oh another bit I caught on the left-o-sphere. ..."

I'll choose a new nick later-Certified Dangerous Radical: "Posted by: mindful webworker - Moron to the stars ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64