« Humpday Afternoon Open Thread | Main | Obama "Fully Embraces" Meeks, Boosts Rubio »
August 18, 2010

Howard Dean: We Must Defend That Mosque's Location Till Our Last Patriotic Breath We Should Probably Find a Compromise Where We Move That Mosque

Bigot!

Via Allah's tweet. At his blog, Obama announces, with typical arrogance, he has "no regrets" for his support of the Ground Zero Mosque, not even to those families forever scarred by 9/11.

The most important part of the post, though, is this:

On a serious note, though, I do agree with Rove and various other GOP strategists that it’d be foolish (and potentially destructive) for Republican pols to hammer this issue too hard. I think centrists and indies are looking, above all, for seriousness of purpose from the GOP about digging the country out of the near-bottomless pit of Obamanomics, especially given the rap on the party in the past for getting “sidetracked” with cultural issues. For every one part mosque messaging, I’d prefer 10 parts messaging on jobs and the economy. Besides, Democrats are in full meltdown over this anyway; if any indies are ripe for the picking on the mosque issue, it’ll be the spectacular idiocy and sneering contempt of Madam Speaker and her colleagues that turns them to the GOP, not anything coming from Newt Gingrich. Rock on, Nancy!

A thousand times yes. Because the thing is, gut issues move people on a subconscious level. And they move them hard.

Except... when people realize that a gut issue is driving them on an emotional level, conditioning kicks in and their reason engages and the fight the urge to be driven by a subterranean impulse and begin growing angry if they feel they are being emotionally manipulated.

You don't have to push these issues very hard. You let them do their own subterranean subconscious work, drip-drip-dripping on the mind, shaping it like rain shaping a cliff-face, with only the smallest amount of prompting. You don't come off all angry, nor do you make it sound as if they only thing you have to offer is this position; you say, "I call upon my Democratic opponent to join with me in persuading the Ground Zero Mosque developers to compromise and find a more sensitive and more appropriate site for their mosque."

And then you focus on the economy, on he brain issue, because you are supposed to be engaging the intellect (and no one can hold that against you).

And while you're engaging on the brain issues, pulling people along little by little with reason, you let the gut issue do its work, in background, underneath.

I'm always suspicious of candidates on the Republican side who base their appeal too much in gut-issues or values-stuff because I'm hardwired to be suspicious of that -- I react away from it because 1, I feel like I'm being conned, and 2, because I consider these issues intellectually easy (intellectually easy, even if morally hard) and thus sort of assume the guy pushing it must be a lightweight, or he'd engage me on some higher-brain issue.

So that's what I think. Sell the brain issues, the economy, security, free-market capitalism. Don't sell so much as merely offer the gut issues. If people want them, you understand.

The thing is, gut issues don't need to be sold. They sell themselves. Like drugs. But no one likes a pusher. Even addicts craving their next fix don't really like pushers.

So keep the heat on, yes, but a light heat, almost seeming as if you're just plum exasperated that Obama's making you discuss this issue while you'd so much rather be discussing getting the economy back on track.

Is this dishonest? No. It's craft.

Like I've said about politics: If you want a woman to come upstairs so you can sleep with her you don't say "Come upstairs so I can sleep with you."

You say: "Come upstairs so I can make you pancakes."

Is that dishonest? No. As if she thinks you're just skillet-crazy to make pancakes for brief acquaintances or something.

Look, if she comes upstairs, she's interested in more than pancakes. But you don't put it all on the line like that.

Baby steps, baby steps. Low buy-in.

"It's So Wrong:" Oh, yeah: and let guys like this tell their stories.

The strategy has to be to raise enough pressure to stop this, and offer the Muslim developers some compromise site so they can save face (because, frankly, I have never encountered a more thin-skinned or face-saving culture in my life).

We do have to pressure them to keep up the rage and keep them from going ahead with this. And so we do have to offer them a safety-valve site.

But we can't appear to be looking too much to score politically off it. Then we lose. If it looks like we really just want to make political hay and let the mosque be built because it's bad for America but good for us, we lose.

We have to focus on actually stopping it.

Oh: I keep saying "we." I mean, specifically, candidates and actual political leaders.

It's completely right -- and necessary -- for Pam Gellar to charge hard on this. She is critical in stopping the mosque. Of course it can be her main issue (or one of them).

I didn't mean to say that everyone has to be careful about overemphasizing this. I meant specifically candidates, who can't appear too greedy to profit politically off this shonda.



digg this
posted by Ace at 04:39 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
votermom pimping great books!: "good boxy morning horde! ..."

wing: "Mornin' Happy Monday ..."

Duke Lowell : "Monday. Ugh. Very boxy. ..."

Vic We Have No Party: "So we have the inindicted felon Holder today.  ..."

Ripley: "I don't like the idea of banning worked but what T ..."

Vic We Have No Party: "Good Morning Morons ..."

votermom pimping great books!: "Tossing of some gays off of the theatre. A musical ..."

rickb223 [/s][/b][/i][/u]: "From quote III: As amended, the bill now merely ..."

x: "I guess every Obama conversation can be tapped un ..."

Bruce: "Maybe they will have a nice stoning too, and perha ..."

The Great White Scotsman: ">>>We can hit a thousand before JJ puts u ..."

The Shrugging Hat: "[i]We can hit a thousand before JJ puts up the EMT ..."

Recent Entries
Search


MuNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat
Archives
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64