Ace: aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
New Jan Brewer Ad: Reading Is Fun-damental To Understanding a Law More: McClintock Rips Calderon
But Democrats don't agree.
Of course they've all read the law -- it's ten pages. Claiming to have not read it allows them to speak of vaguely-defined "concerns" without having to point out specific language in the bill they object to -- because if they did the latter, they'd be unable to find anything illegal here.
What they're attempting to do is claim they support, of course, the substance of the bill -- of course they agree with enforcing the border! -- while pretending their objection is over procedural matters. This pose allows them to pretend for the 70% of the country that supports the bill that they're on their side, at least as regards the big substantive goal of the bill.
But mouthing vague quibbles about procedural issues gets them goodwill from the 30% who oppose the bill, aka "The Democratic Base."
If they ever read the bill -- or admit they do -- they'll find this sort of Yasser Arafat-like equivocation more difficult. Because it will quickly be revealed that their supposedly procedure-only quibbles are in fact objections to the substance -- they oppose any methods of controlling immigration that are actually likely to work.
They support only the methods that won't work -- UAVs, "virtual fences," other technobabble non-solutions -- precisely because they won't work, which is why they have a pass from the Open Borders lobby to support such measures.
Essentially they're asking the bank robbers what they should do to improve vault security. The bank robbers tell them to leave the vault door open and turn off the alarms and fire the guards, and instead use "smart solutions" to guard the money, like big signs saying "Please don't take our money."
Thanks to Jake.
More: McClintock makes a stand.
And still more: Brewer tells Greta she's sent many letters to administration officials begging them for border help, and they've ignored them -- not even replied. Do your job, she tells President Lightworkerweight.