Ace: aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
The Science Isn't Quite So Settled After All...UK Met Office Says It's Time To Recheck All The Temperature Data
Anyone who wants to reexamine the data is an anti-science nut job pretty much part of the mainstream. My how quickly things change.
In a document entitled Proposal for a New International Analysis of Land Surface Air Temperature Data, the Met Office says: “We feel it is timely to propose an international effort to reanalyse surface temperature data in collaboration with the World Meteorological Organisation.”
The new analysis would test the conclusion reached by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that “warming of the climate system is unequivocal”.
...The Met Office document stresses that the new assessment would be fully independent and be based on data that was freely available to the public and could therefore be examined by climate sceptics.
It says: “The proposed activity would provide a set of independent assessments of surface temperature produced by independent groups using independent methods.”
Naturally they say they don't expect the review to show anything any different but the fact that they are being forced to release raw data and start the fight over from scratch is a big victory for sanity. 6 or 7 months ago anyone suggesting this kind of transparency and reassessment would have been derided as 'a denier' and branded a heretic to the Cult of Gaia. Now one of the lead agencies pushing the warming agenda is on board? That's gotta smart.
Related enough, via Adam Baldwin (yes, Jayne Cobb himself), a fairly reasonable debate on the issue from, of all places, the Bill O'Reilly.
It's hard out there for a Gaia worshiper these days.