Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« President Announces Support for Iranian Protesters | Main | Obama Zeroes Out Spending for Promoting Democracy in Iran »
June 19, 2009

Andrew Sullivan and Khamanei Agree: Jew-Controlled Media Spreads Lies

I try not to mention him anymore, but every once in a while his early-onset dementia is too delicious to ignore. (Safe link to the Weekly Standard.)

I hope Goldfarb will excuse me quoting the whole thing:

ran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei offered his first public statement today on the week-long protest sparked by the fraudulent electoral victory of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. He blamed “media belonging to Zionists, evil media” for fueling divisions in Iran. Meanwhile, Andrew Sullivan -- who writes today of "the Khamenei-Neocon agreement" -- yesterday asserted that the Washington Post was publishing "op-eds peddling dishonest partial numbers to buttress Ahmadinejad, because that's what the neocons wanted." And just in case you think Sullivan might not necessarily be using the term neocon as a substitute for Zionist, he helpfully clears up any confusion by referring to the paper's op-ed page as "hackneyed AIPAC boilerplate." So while Sullivan and Khamenei may disagree over what end the Jews seek through their nefarious control of the media, they both understand what the real threat is.

It's jawdropping that Sullivan would claim that "neocons" and "AIPAC" would want the revolution to fail. One American clearly seeks the failure of the revolution, but that's his own fantasy-boyfriend Barack Obama. And Sullivan can't say that his would-be boyfriend is in the wrong, so he puts Barack Obama's words into the mouths of his enemies -- "neocons" (by which he means Jews) and AIPAC (by which he means Jews).

Did I say one American opposed the revolution? My bad. Two. The man Sullivan passionately supported on the Republican side of the campaign -- Jew-hatin' race-baitin' conspiracy-addled Ron Paul -- also does.

So that's two of Andi's crushbook favorites who are flacking for Ahmadinejad and the mullahs. But who gets blamed? The Jews, naturally.

Screenshot: At Legal Insurrection, so you can savor the sweet, sweet dementia, without giving Andi (with a heart over the i) a click.

A Colleague at The Atlantic... "can't figure out Andrew's post."

Well, of course he can figure it out. As Goldberg has hinted at before, Sullivan has gone off his trolley and is pretty comfortable now expressing his long-time anti-semitic impulses.

He says he "can't figure out Andrew's post" to be polite.

One of the people named in the attacks by Andi (heart over the i) is Fred Hiatt of the WaPo, who also can't make heads or tails of his rantngs:

It is so incoherent, it's hard to know how to comment. But I will try. He says I was acting on neocon orders when we published a piece suggesting that Ahmadinejad may have actually had popular support. But elsewhere I am being attacked for publishing ostensibly neocon pieces criticizing Obama for not supporting Ahmadenejad's opposition. It's hard to see how both could be true.

I had forgotten until today that Dan (Froomkin) had gone after Charles (Krauthammer), which Sullivan says 'almost certainly' would have 'enraged' me.

Why would Sullivan claim that an attack on Charles Krauthammer would "enrage" Fred Hiatt? What is Fred Hiatt, Mrs. Charles Krauthammer?

No. Fred Hiatt is Jewish and so he will protect his own. ("Neocons" protect their own, Sullivan just wrote.)

Sullivan's not the only one with issues about the "Jewish Extremist" Fred Hiatt, by the way. Caution: That descriptor is from, and that link to, David Duke's blog.

Fred Hiatt: Wanted on six counts
of premeditated Judaism and suspicion of
noshing with malice aforethought

If you have any doubt that Sullivan is an anti-semite, I invite you once again to ponder how risible the claim is that Jews, of all people, are actually buddies with Khamenei and Ahmadinejad. And carrying their water.

Or neocons, for that matter, who aren't Jews (though Sullivan uses them as rough synonyms).

Iran has been fighting a proxy war against Israel since 1979 and its highest officers routinely threaten to wipe it off the map with a first-strike nuclear holocaust.

Any supporter of Israel -- Jewish or not -- would dearly wish Ahmadinejad to crumble into dust.

This is the most madcap of old-timey Jewish conspiracy ranting, where not only are Jews to be blamed for making trouble with foreign powers to further their own suspiciously-Yiddish interests, they're also, incoherently, alleged to be making secret pacts with those same foreign powers to further their dangerously-Hebraic agendas.

This is Nazi-type stuff, claiming Jews are both on both sides of every conflict and in fact the puppet-masters puppeteering both sides for their own nefarious, gefilte- stinking ends.

Krauthammer is castigated for agreeing with Sullivan, for crying out loud. The problem seems to be that Sullivan resents his Jude meddling.

Good Lord: Sullivan invites us to understand the mind of Judeo-cons.

Understanding The Neocons

A reader writes:

I had a conversation at lunch yesterday with a friend, a neocon Jewish American, that fascinated me. We were getting ready to get up from the table when he said, "Hey, wait a minute, do you want to talk politics for a minute?" We proceeded to discuss the events in Iran and at one point I brought up my amazement at the protesters' embrace of non-violence and their courage in the face of aggression. I said, "I wonder if this will be a lesson to the Palestinians. That perhaps if they renounce violence and embrace peaceful resistance they too could garner more international support for their cause, a la Gandhi." His reaction fascinated me. He got this very serious, dour look on his face and replied, "That's what worries me. The biggest existential threat to Israel is that the Palestinians will realize the potential for non-violence and embrace it."

I finally understood why some of the more cynical neocons cannot stand the Green Revolution. Without a conflict, without a bogey man to demonize, they are scared to death. In their minds their legitimacy comes from the fact that they are better than the bogey man, that they are necessary to keep the bogey man at bay. I don't think that the nation of Israel is so fragile that it could not come to terms with a peaceful movement for Palestinian statehood.

Me neither.

Incidentally, after posting this, Sullivan claimed that Goldfarb's (JEW) insinuations were "vile" and too "tedious" to respond to. And also, he says there's a difference between neocons and Jews.

Though he seems really, really upset about neocons who are specifically Jewish.

Anyway, just before saying how "vile" these "smears" were, he posts this email from an antisemitic reader (and remember: he invited anti-semites from Ron Paul's basket-case coalition to his blog last year) suggesting that Jew-cons actually feared a truly peaceful Palestinian movement, with the implication being, of course, that such a movement is against their interests and therefore Jews are most likely deliberately making the Palestinians attack them.

Again, Nazi-type stuff. Jews so crafty and insidious they make the Palestinians rain rockets on them, because they're so afraid of peace. Jews are once again on both sides of the conflict. No matter who wins, Jews win.

All evil is caused by Jews -- even when it makes no sense. Jews are both killing Palestinians and, incoherently, jerking the puppet-strings of Palestinians to make them kill Jews.

It's this kind of unreasoning, hateful, demented illogic that defines the first-order anti-semite.

If you want to believe Jews are too warlike when it comes to the Palestinians, fine, I guess you can believe that if you want.

But if you want to claim they're simultaneously making war on the Palestinians and tricking the Palestinians into making war on themselves, so they in turn can make more war on the Palestinians... well, you've crossed the line from legitimate criticism of Israel into full-fledged "The Jews are behind it all' anti-semitic conspiracy lunacy.

Mel Gibson was forced into retirement for saying one night while drunk what Andrew Sullivan writes every day while sober.

digg this
posted by Ace at 04:20 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Count de Monet: "Buenas Nachos! ..."

Moron Robbie - Until scrubbed docs show other it's safe to assume the antifa shooter was a tranny: "Ardy ran bonhomme of because of his religion why d ..."

Oedipus: "Dude, was this a clean first shot by Ace? I don't ..."

Eye Socket is a DNA Cup Holder: "561 Where is Dan Crenshaw? Posted by: Soothsayer ..."

ALH: "Yabba Dabba Do! ..."

OrangeEnt: "Is that Chicago on fire in the far background, Mis ..."

AlaBAMA: "Man has 11 children! ..."

Anonymous Rogue in Kalifornistan (ARiK): "Thank you for ONT Mis Hum. Great pic up top. Are ..."

Scarlett O'Hara : "What a night of powerful personal stories. ..."

ALH: "Top 10 ..."

AlaBAMA: "WWII vet from Wisconsin! ..."

Ciampino - Wed Update #01: "The link for Quote II gave me a 404 error. ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64