« Indiana Pensions Lose Fight for Chrysler Stay | Main | Another Sotomayor Dismissal »
May 26, 2009

Sotomayor's Lazy, Vapid, and Authoritarian Jurisprudence

Forgive me if this was already linked by a coblogger. I want to call it out and highlight it. This will be the main attack on Sotomayor, both on her racist reasoning and her lack of intellect and thoroughness.

It's not merely where she comes down on a reverse-discrimination case -- it's the reasoning, or rather the complete lack of any reasoning, that leads to that conclusion.

She and Obama make much of her "empathy." With a record like this, it's no surprise that they're making the case on her feelings rather than, say, her "thorough and masterful understanding of the Constitution."

U.S. Appeals Court Judge Sonia Sotomayor, mentioned as a possible Supreme Court nominee, voted to deny a racial discrimination claim in a 2008 decision. She dismissed the case in a one-paragraph statement that, in the opinion of one dissenting judge, ignored the evidence and did not even address the constitutional issues raised by the case.

The case, Ricci v. DeStefano, involved a group of 19 white firefighters and one Hispanic firefighter who filed suit in 2003 claiming that the city of New Haven, Conn., engaged in racial discrimination when it threw out the results of two promotion tests because none of the city’s black applicants had passed the tests.

Each of the plaintiffs had passed the exam. The case is currently before the U.S. Supreme Court.

...

U.S. Appeals Court Judge Sotomayor issued an order that affirmed Arterton’s decision, issuing a one-paragraph judgment that called Arterton’s ruling “thorough, thoughtful, and well reasoned,”

But according to dissenting Judge Jose Cabranes, the single-paragraph order issued by Sotomayor and her colleagues ignored over 1,800 pages of testimony and more than an hour of argument--ignoring the facts of the case.

“(T)he parties submitted briefs of 86 pages each and a six-volume joint appendix of over 1,800 pages; plaintiffs’ reply brief was over thirty pages long," Cabranes wrote.

"(O)ral argument, on December 10, 2007, lasted over an hour,” Cabranes explained, adding that more than two months after oral arguments, Sotomayor and the majority panel upheld the lower court in a summary order “containing a single substantive paragraph.”

Cabranes criticized Sotomayor and the majority for not explaining why they had sided with the city in their new opinion.

“This per curiam opinion adopted in toto the reasoning of the District Court, without further elaboration or substantive comment, and thereby converted a lengthy, unpublished district court opinion, grappling with significant constitutional and statutory claims of first impression, into the law of this Circuit,” Cabranes wrote in his dissent.

Judge Cabranes also said that Sotomayor’s opinion failed to address the constitutional issues of the case, saying the majority had ignored the facts of the case as well.

“It did so, moreover, in an opinion that lacks a clear statement of either the claims raised by the plaintiffs or the issues on appeal. Indeed, the opinion contains no reference whatsoever to the constitutional claims at the core of this case,” the judge criticized.

“This Court has failed to grapple with the questions of exceptional importance raised in this appeal,” Judge Cabranes concluded. “If the Ricci plaintiffs are to receive such an opinion from a reviewing court they must now look to the Supreme Court. Their claims are worthy of that review.”

In fairness, she did cite the seminal case of I Know You Are v. But What Am I?

A serious case deserves more a more serious argument than "Because I Said So." She couldn't make the case -- the contortions, evasions, and deceptions of liberal heavy hitters like William Brennan were beyond her intellectual grasp -- so she just wrote "Shut up, that's why."

More at the link. This is the juiciest case, but there are more.

Intellectually Incurious? Bear in mind, President Bush was derided by the left for years for lacking, it was claimed, the inclination and ability to seriously think through difficult questions, preferring to simply announce outcomes as "The Decider."

And Sotomayor...?


digg this
posted by Ace at 05:04 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
votermom pimping great books!: "good morning horde! took le pooch out to pee ..."

Iron Mike Golf: "Morning, everyone. Got my cookbook yesterday! ..."

Vic We Have No Party: "[i]Good morning kids. I'm old enough, and by now s ..."

Cannibal Bob: "Hello all. ..."

Mr. Peebles: "Time to set our beards on fire and begin the slaug ..."

Bruce: "JJ is Nood ..."

Vic We Have No Party: "Good Morning Morons ..."

Heidi: "Good Morning all! ..."

BackwardsBoy [/i][/s][/b]: "[I]Thats really shocking. These texts are a gold m ..."

Iron Mike Golf: "[i]781 I had my first trial run with 46" blade o ..."

CrotchetyOldJarhead: "Posted by: NaCly Dog at December 13, 2017 06:38 AM ..."

The Great White Scotsman: ">>>>Oh man, the MSM will be insufferab ..."

Recent Entries
Search


MuNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat
Archives
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64