Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« Gallup Traditional Likely Model: 49-47 | Main | Ohio Rules Homeless Can List Park Bench as a Residence for Registration and Voting Purposes »
October 28, 2008

Building a Rightroots

I never was all that big into this idea. I think it's now necessary if we're ever going to start winning like we used to.

The GOP needs to do its part, too. It shouldn't be up to John Hawkins to compile a list of House GOP challengers. The GOP needs a permanent online liaison, not just charged with sending out press releases and that sort of thing, but with providing information about candidates -- who's vulnerable, who's a solid challenger, etc.

I wrote someone a while ago asking them specifically where I should ask readers for help in phone banking and GOTV. There wasn't a reply.

I also wrote back to Hawkins:

you know what we really need to promote? Grassroots candidate recruitment. We gave up a couple of elections this cycle for want of a candidate.

think of all the military types (and doctors, and farmers, teachers, businessmen,
etc.,) we reach. We have to convince them to put their hats in the
ring in 2010.

We need to tell them there's a briefing book the party hands out that
will tell them the right position on all the issues they don't give a
shit about.

Which are most of them, really, assuming they're not mutants.

We need to start recruiting solid candidates early.

And seriously -- if your life has been mostly scandal-free, and if you've achieved some distinction in your field (especially military-- Good Lord, we should own this one), guess what? You're a solid candidate for Congress or the statehouses.

It doesn't matter that you don't know all the issues. The only people who know all the issues are currently either serving as legislators or are lobbyists, and they don't know all the issues, either.

The Democrats have their recruitment pipeline-- lawyers, bureaucrats. The GOP has a much bigger and better talent pool, but we don't exploit it.

I'm not sure why. I think it's because so many people assume, "Gee, I could never do that."

Well, of course you could. If the Democrats can put up one hack lawyer after another, why isn't a Master Sergeant war hero a good candidate?

We need an army of Sarah Palins in 2010.

Look at Joe the Plumber. Pretty sharp guy. pretty likable. He doesn't have the alleged credentials to be a Congressmen -- by which I mean he's not a hack trial lawyer or sub-bureaucrat at the Department of Cutting Checks for People Who Don't Work. So what? He's got what it takes -- he's bright, politically interested, presentable, and, if he does decide to run, backed by a major political party.

I think an awful lot of people fit this profile.

Especially military men and women.

For God's sakes, guys: You know you have a better than even chance of winning just by showing up?

Think about it as just a slightly distasteful new tour of service. One one hand, you'll be surrounded by mutants and halfwits. On the other hand, no one will be shooting at you and there will be lots of free barbecue and (weak) chicken cordon blue.

On Military Candidates...

A military guy (name withheld) writes...

“Well, of course you could. If the Democrats can put up one hack lawyer after another, why isn't a Master Sergeant war hero a good candidate?”

Ask David Bellavia. McCain called him and asked him to run. The GOP in NY called and asked him to run. He announced his candidacy and three days later a multi-millionaire businessman in the district announced. Then the GOP asked David to drop out because this guy could self-finance. So Bellavia looks like a douche for entering a race that they didn’t want him in. So, you lose one pissed off medal of honor nominee that would have been a good candidate but at least the GOP got their self-financer.

2 years ago I went to weekly meetings at the RNC. I mentioned one day that the GOP was pissing off veterans, a reliable constituency. I told them how they could fix that. My thanks was to never be invited back since, despite the fact that I am a reliable conservative.

Make no mistake, elections are expensive, the RNC has limited funds, and for both parties, self-financing (or at least name recognition which leads to good fundraising) is increasingly important.

However, the GOP should know that everyone on the right side of the internet would constantly link the donation page for any war hero running for Congress (or a state house). And the readers would donate.

We just need some coordination on this.

I'm pretty sure I can guarantee that any war hero running for Congress would be effectively self-financing.

Or rather, you guys can guarantee that.

Pete Olson... is a Navy vet running for DeLay's old carved-up district.

He's up by 17.

True enough, it's a Republican tilting district.

But frankly, we're going to need solid challengers in some Republican-tilting districts -- we've been losing them lately -- and they win in swing districts, too.

Ask the Democrats. They ran several neophyte politicians from the military in 2006 and pretty much won them all.

It's time for the party hacks to step aside and let the veterans run.

The party hacks haven't done a whole much for us lately, but the veterans have done an awful lot.

Thanks to Dave in Texas for that.

And really -- I shouldn't be updated on this stuff from cobloggers. Not to overstate my importance, but the internet is a huge fundraising and name-recognition machine. Honestly, the GOP should have us on conference calls every week.

Not for bullshit getting-the-message out. They do that. And we do get the message out.

But to be more involved in this. As in, making some decisions and offering input.

Personally the prospect of yet another conference call where I get the talking points I already knew (based on common sense) and was already getting out anyway isn't all that appealing.

Right bloggers have let the team down. Or at least I have. I personally spend too much time campaigning against the media and not enough time campaigning for actual candidates.

It's a hard habit to break -- I really don't want to do the team rah-rah thing. I can do it a bit, but it's against my nature.

But the GOP has to be a bit savvier about this, too. The internet is not just a vehicle for putting out press releases and posting YouTube ads, you know.

And back to military candidates: I have trouble supporting career politicians. Why? Because I assume they're pretty douchey.

I'm pretty sure my assumption is mostly correct.

I don't like politicians. Even the ones on our side.

I don't have that aversion with military people -- quite the opposite. Or distinguished citizens stepping up to do their bit for the country.

digg this
posted by Ace at 01:57 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Ciampino --- Learn sign language. It's very handy: "Tech Thread is late tonight? ..."

JT: "Thanks Skip ! ..."

JT: " Going to City today, should leave little after 5 ..."

buddhaha: "Divide by Zero. Enjoy the rest of their "cover" c ..."

Skip : "Going to City today, should leave little after 5 ..."

Miklos spends half his day changing batteries: "And Darleen is gonna be here in approximately 4.3 ..."

Miklos spends half his day changing batteries: "My fun detector has gone flat dead. ..."

Swedish Aunt Miklos: "1 don't want to get up Posted by: Skip Getten ..."

Skip : "1 don't want to get up ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b]: "And I'm up earlier than I planned thanks to an ann ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b]: "Morning to all you insomniacals out there! Thursd ..."

Ciampino - Learn sign language. It's very handy: "A sign of great wit! People share the very creativ ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64