Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« Canadian Teen Dies; Father Charged | Main | Ike Turner, RIP »
December 12, 2007

More on Jones/KBR "Gang Rape" Allegations

Everyone's dancing on eggshells about this, and I suppose that's proper. Still, if one ventures a perfectly honest opinion, I think one has to say that frequently changing allegations are not generally taken to be a sign of veracity.

In February 2006, Jamie Leigh Jones filed an arbitration complaint, complaining that, for her administrative assistant job with KBR in Iraq, she was placed in an all-male dorm for living arrangements, and a co-worker sexually assaulted her. (KBR says the co-worker claimed the sex was consensual, though Jones claims physical injuries, such as burst breast implants and torn pectoral muscles, that are plainly not consistent with consensual sex. The EEOC’s Letter of Determination credited the allegation of sexual assault.)

Fifteen months later, after extensive discovery in the arbitration, Jones, who lives in Houston, and whose lawyer is based in Houston, and who worked for KBR in Houston, sued KBR and a bunch of other entities (including Halliburton, for whom she never worked, and the United States), in federal court in Beaumont, Texas. The claims were suddenly of much more outrageous conduct: the original allegation of a single he-said/she-said sexual assault was now an allegation of gang rape by several unknown John Doe rapists who worked as firemen (though she did make a claim of multiple rape to the EEOC, though it is unclear when that claim was made); she claims that after she reported the rape, “Halliburton locked her in a container” (the EEOC found that KBR provided immediate medical treatment and safety and shipped her home immediately) and she threw in an allegation that a “sexual favor” she provided a supervisor in Houston was the result of improper “influence.” (But she no longer makes the implausible claim that she was living in an all-male dorm in Iraq.)

Not to mention her claim that all the evidence of the gang-rape was turned over by Army doctors to KBR agents who immediately destroyed the rape kits, and the implication that these Army doctors are, for reasons unfathomable, keeping radio-silent because, I guess, they really want gang-rapists to go free.

Yeah, the disclaimer: It's possible this happened. Her fresh charges (a gang rape, being locked in a container) and her retracted charges (being housed in an all-male dorm) could be explained away.

But what are those explanations? Does anyone inquire to ask, or is asking her too insensitive?

Are we to again say, "Oh yes, women frequently forget all the details of a rape and offer shifting stories for months afterwards" as we did in the Duke case? How about we just risk some insensitivity and demand she credibly explain the evolution of her claims?

I have trouble believing this affair she had with her supervisor was due to his somehow blackmailing her over her sick mother. It sounds like after-the-fact bullshit made up for the benefit of a cuckolded husband... and it especially sounds like that now that I find out this is a fairly recent allegation.

I seem to remember a recent lurid allegation of gang-rape with similar evidentiary problems. Everyone just assumed the complainant must be telling the truth -- including me, quite frankly -- and we all know how that turned out.

Well, we don't all know how that turned out. Amanda Marcotte, Jill From Feminste, etc., are still pretty sure "something happened" there.

Thanks to CJ.

Oh: As the Overlawyered blogger cited by Michelle (and quoted above notes), it's possible that she's honest about the rape, basically, but lying about most everything else.

Why? Well, for the same reason women often lie about the exact circumstances of a rape in a civil lawsuit: Because rapists are piss-poor and judgment proof whereas corporations are rich cash bonanzas... if only a credible claim of negligence on the part of the corporation can be made. And if that means alleging, say, that you frequently warned your employers that its parking lot was unsafe at night and improperly lit and so on and so forth, well, even if it's not quite true, if that's what it takes to make a case that's what it takes to make a case.

There are a lot of civil lawsuits about rape where the rape is never in any doubt whatsoever. The whole fight is over whether or not the employer or corporation or whoever was negligent in preventing the rape. And that's where sometimes the allegations begin to evolve to neatly track with the requirements of a negligence suit.

digg this
posted by Ace at 07:26 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
President Skroob: "[i]379 Everyone knows the launch code is 000000000 ..."

Yudhishthira's Dice: "The SS agents are shits and treat the dog like shi ..."

Oldcat: "356 I got an alert on my cellphone that some cellp ..."

Jordan61: "st ..."

weft cut-loop[/i][/b] [/s]: "Wait, Goog is ending GMail? ..."

bonhomme[/i][/i][/i][/b][/b][/b][/s][/s][/s][/u][/u][/u]: "> I got an alert on my cellphone that some cellpho ..."

Joe Mannix (Not a cop!): "In most homicide cases across the country, it woul ..."

jim (in Kalifornia) [/b] [/s] [/i] [/u]: "362 Why do we need pronouns? ... Posted by: Cat ..."

Super Judge Roberts: "372 Biden's dog is biting his bodyguards because h ..."

Cat Ass Trophy : "Everyone knows the launch code is 000000000. ..."

ghbucky: "In an interesting coincidence? I work in support o ..."

TheJamesMadison, finishing up the Best Pictures: "372 Biden's dog is biting his bodyguards because h ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64