Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Recent Entries
Daily Tech News 7 October 2024
Sunday Overnight Open Thread (10/6/24) Gun Thread: It's October Edition! Food Thread: Braising...It's not just fancy welding! First-World Problems... Free Speech Is Under Attack, And There Is No Accommodation With The Attackers Sunday Morning Book Thread - 10-06-2024 ["Perfessor" Squirrel] Daily Tech News 6 October 2024 Saturday Overnight Open Thread (10/5/24) Music Thread: The Unbearable Lightness Of Messenger Bags Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
|
« Big Surprise In Russia |
Main
| Chavez's "Reforms" Defeated »
December 02, 2007
Heartache: Mary Katharine Ham sides with the "deciders".Mary Katharine is a friend of mine. I take no pleasure in publicly disagreeing with her. But, I think her take on the CNN/YouTube debate is wrong. So at the risk of being grumpy old Lou Grant to her "turn the world on with her smile" Mary Richards, I'm going to tell you why. Now, MKH titles her latest blog entry "Should We Republicans, Young and Old, Pretty Much Confirm the Old Fogey Republican Stereotype for all time by Torpedoing New Technology Experiments and Debates in Light of the Problems with this one?" She admits that she is intentionally tweaking folks with the title. And it is a rhetorically funny question. Except that I'm here to answer "Yes." UPDATE:If any of you are interested, MKH just responded to me over at her place. She gave as good as she got. It's fair. Read her piece, and if you disagree please be polite. She's a friend, and in this instance if I see a familiar name from here crossing the line in her comments, I'll bring out the AoS ban hammer. MKH raises three points in her piece. I'll address them in order. I've never bought into the idea that YouTube debates were a revolutionary format-- different but not revolutionary--mostly because moderators still pick the questions, and technology's transformative only to an extent. I'm not a tech triumphalist. Quite simply, they aren't a revolutionary format. There really isn't anything to buy into here. They make for more engaging TV, perhaps, than watching folks stand up in the audience to ask their questions. And, they are more compelling than watching a spit-flecked Chris Matthews bark out 20 questions from a blue index card. But the notion of citizens directly addressing questions to candidates is nothing new. Go to a town hall meeting sometime to see it done the "old fashioned way." But there is something happening here, and, unlike Dylan's "Mr. Jones" I think Mary Katharine's title reveals that she knows what it is. It's the elevation of style over substance. Of the hip and the trendy over the old and routine. And, sadly, it seems that's the core of her support for it: the desire to be seen as "cool". For her next point is this, notice the "hipper than thou" snark contained within: I've also never bought into the idea that YouTube debates debase politics, partly because they're already plenty debased, and partly because political YouTubers are-- to a great extent-- regular Americans who want to be engaged and get a chance to ask their own questions of a candidate that they wouldn't necessarily otherwise get. That's not debasement, that's democracy. Did you see it? Sure, a little cynicism about politics never hurt anyone. It's part and parcel of the Conservative skepticism about government that most of us at this site share. But to basically state "hey, politics is so low, nothing that pops up on YouTube can hurt it anymore" is hardly a ringing endorsement. In fact, it's a rather destructive, dare I say, libertine view of the world. If politics is so debased, MKH, shouldn't we be more concerned about elevating discourse rather than rationalizing or justifying its descent to the lowest common denominator? What you've done is set a standard that now justifies pretty much any negative ad anyone could ever desire to run. Who cares if Candidate A runs an ad falsely accusing Candidate B of necrophilia 3 days prior to the election? Politics are debased, and that commercial can't possibly make people more disgusted with the system, could it? Would you condemn that ad? If so, on what grounds? That's it's false? Well, so were the phonies pretending to be people that they are not, pushing issues that really don't concern them on YouTube. That it debases politics? Too bad, you don't apparently care. Which is a shame: such an ad should be condemned. We should not hesitate to call demeaning things demeaning for fear of risking street cred. Of course YouTube debates debase politics. Their entire premise is based on bringing politics to the level of a carnival freakshow. Talking snowmen don't belong on a stage addressing questions to men and women seeking elected office. It belittles the process. And yet, the talking snowman was picked. Why? Exactly because he WASN'T one of "the regular Americans" you seem to believe they are. Are there regular Americans who read blogs and create videos for YouTube? Of course there are (present company excluded, of course). But YouTube places a different emphasis on the matter: it becomes not "I want my question to be heard" as much as it becomes "I want my question to be aired/seen." And why is this an important distinction? Because it allows the "deciders" to set the framing of the issue. Do I care about 2nd Amendment rights? You bet I do. But someone who would have presented an regular (albeit, incredibly handsome) image like me wasn't picked to ask a question. A guy who looked like he ran a "compound" in Idaho, complete with a 'do rag, pump action shotgun and crossed bandoliers was. So what image comes across to the people watching? A guy in a suit and tie, sitting at a desk, calmly asking a thoughtful question or a guy who looked like he was a bad hairday away from shooting up Columbine? Still think it doesn't matter? It isn't "democracy" in action, MKH. Unless the votes of the CNN staff in selecting the clips are the democracy you are referring to in your sentence. Now you sort of acknowledge this point of concern. But, again, you default to a position I can only describe as "Hipness uber alles." But ultimately, I don’t think there was any good political way to decline to do the YouTube debate. I was talking to some of the YouTubers at the debate, and asking what they thought about the idea that we’re debasing the political process or that the talking snowman distracts from real issues, etc. She said: There was a fine political way to decline the YouTube debate, MKH. Romney (to his credit) should have stuck to his guns when he initially declined to appear. He was right then. You think GOP voters would punish Republicans for telling CNN to shove it? No more than Dem voters hold their FOX boycott against their candidates. And, I'm sorry, but I don't think that protecting the "image of the right wing web" is particularly relevant to much of anything. Tell me, how "hip" was Ronald Reagan? How "hip" was Margaret Thatcher? How "hip" was Barry Goldwater? If you ask me, "hipness" is a vastly overrated quality in a political candidate. But then again, I wasn't much impressed with Bill Clinton playing saxophone on Arsenio either. Or when he "hiply" answered the question about "boxers or briefs." I thought that was debasing, actually. Oh, right. Look...I know you have a lot vested in this internet video thing. And you do a great job. You know I hold you in nothing but the highest regard, both personally and professionally. But it's disappointing to see Conservatives worshipping at the altar of "cool", as you appear to be doing here. To treasure style and appearance over substance. For, if college teaches us anything, it is that the Conservatives who do this are the Conservatives who end up on the path that leads to Libertarianism. And you can do so much better. You usually do. | Recent Comments
SFGoth:
"Wolfus - or take more. ;-> ..."
Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b]: "I don't want to be up either, Skip. But I took of ..." Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b]: "Stateless, as regards THC capsules: Earlier this ..." Buzz Adrenaline: "John Boozman Is Senator from Arkansas ..." Skip : "I don't want to get up ..." Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b]: "Morining, fellow insomaniacals! You know what the ..." Adriane the Brevity Challenged Critic . . .: "[i] The GOP delegation, led by Sen. Jerry Moran (K ..." Recorded Webcams: "However, that's successfully the identical as sayi ..." SFGoth: "I have been getting edibles and capsules. Do you h ..." Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, : "[i]She seems professional and friendly to boot. No ..." togel online: "Good respond in return of this matter with firm ..." Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, : "A lion bit my dad once. Posted by: jim (in Kalifo ..." Recent Entries
Daily Tech News 7 October 2024
Sunday Overnight Open Thread (10/6/24) Gun Thread: It's October Edition! Food Thread: Braising...It's not just fancy welding! First-World Problems... Free Speech Is Under Attack, And There Is No Accommodation With The Attackers Sunday Morning Book Thread - 10-06-2024 ["Perfessor" Squirrel] Daily Tech News 6 October 2024 Saturday Overnight Open Thread (10/5/24) Music Thread: The Unbearable Lightness Of Messenger Bags Search
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) |