Polar Bears' Numbers Increasing, Not Decreasing

And yet the theoenvironmental movement is determined to get them lableld "endangered" anyway. Why? Because they're cute, and because doing so validates their predictions by mau-mauing the EPA into pretending they know the bears will be threatened in 100 years or so.

As a guy says, we deal in facts, not hazy predictions. And the fact is that polar bears are thriving, thanks in part to all those delicious baby Harp seals they get to club to death and then eat.

Question: If we're going to give in to the theoenviromentalists and call bears "endangered" due to long-range, extremely dubious computer modeling, shouldn't we also put human beings on the endangered list? After all, supposedly we're all going to be killed from either 1) heat exhaustion or 2) frostbite by like next Shivouas or something.

And if we are endangered -- doesn't that sort of loosen up the cuffs on us to start killing some of these other animals we're competing with?

Thanks to Larwyn.

posted by Ace at 05:51 PM

| Access Comments