The 10/11 Truth Movement Starts Here

Several posters are suspicious of this story. I am as well.

FACT: A "single engine plane" COULD NOT crash into an apartment building and merely knock out a few windows.

FACT: The fires burning in the building COULD NOT have been caused by the mere ignition of aircraft fuel. The plane in question was too small to carry enough feul to start such a large fire.

FACT: CIA/Mossad have been known to plant pyrotechnic devices in their past. Could they have planted firebombs in the precise apartment the plane hit? It seems likely.

FACT: It is possible to steer a plane by remote control -- especially a small one.

FACT: Someone notes that Yankees pitcher Cory Lidel's passport was "found" on the street near the crash -- just like Mohammad Atta's passport was found in the 9/11 "wreckage."

FACT: The Upper East Side is known to be largely Jewish. And yet no one was home when the plane struck the apartments. Why did the Jews choose to go to work that day? Were they warned by Mossad/PNAC/William Kristol that they should go to work as usual, rather than staying home?

FACT: The Yankees were just eliminated from AL playoffs, making Cory Lidel "conveniently" available to "pilot" a "plane."

FACT: It is well known the Yankees are the most lavishly-funded sports team in the world (largely through Jewish money), and can win the World Series whenever they really want to.

FACT: George Steinbrenner. Steinbrenner. Enough said.

FACT: It is also well known that all aircraft disasters are caused by brown people. Cory Lidel is not brown. He's not even off-white. Why the "rush to judgment" to pin this on Cory Lidel, a non-brown person in perfect standing, when there are literally millions of brown persons whose whereabouts cannot be ascertained for the period in question?

FACT: Initial "eyewitness" reports displayed great disagreement. Some insisted it was a "helicopter" that "crashed" into the building; others claimed a "small plane." Why was there so much dispute on such a readily-ascertained fact? There can be only one answer: Because it was actually a cruise missile fired by an offshore US submarine.

...and the most damning fact of all...

FACT: Absolutely no cameras -- NONE -- captured pictures or videos of this supposed "plane" hitting the apartment building. A small plane travels slow enough to be easily captured by even cheap video cameras. This strongly suggests the "aircraft" which hit the building was travelling too quickly to be captured on film, and again was therefore most likely a cruise missile fired by an offshore US submarine, almost certainly painted with Zionist slogans like "We love money!" and "Ben Gazzara Rocks!"

posted by Ace at 06:19 PM

| Access Comments