Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Revenge, Sweet Revenge, For "The Nech" | Main | Sorry, More Hiltzik-- It's Just TOO F'N' GOOD
April 20, 2006

More Hiltzik

Allah tips this guy had a little problem in the 90's, something having to do with reading co-workers' emails. I'm still tracking that one down.

But I did find this bit by this guy, defending the LATimes against Patterico's charges of liberal bias. Ummm, if you're going to claim no leftist bias, try to do so without lapsing into leftist cant while doing so.

[Blogging media critics'] techniques include a promiscuous use of labels as shorthand slurs ("leftist" and "liberal" being, of course, their most popular denigrations). They no doubt find this technique valuable because once they can hang a label on a newspaper or a journalist, they can dispense with anything so fundamental as discussion or argument. Some also favor imputations of treason or unpatriotism; contentions that the offending reporters and editors are detached in spirit from their readership; and suggestions that what underlies their political deviancy is moral turpitude. To back up their assertions, they often quote articles selectively, take out of context what they do quote, and ascribe imaginary motivations to reporters and editors, which they then feel free to decry. As any student of history knows, these are tools and techniques that were used to great effect during the Stalinist show trials of the ‘40s and ‘50s. The functionaries who wielded them then had the same goals as the self-anointed press watchdogs on the right do today: To support the regime in power through intimidation and threat and to impose ideological conformity, while avoiding at all costs debate on the merits.

These critics equate a newspaper’s failure to parrot a conservative, Republican, or Bush Administration line with inaccuracy, or cavalierly interpret it as evidence of "bias." Unconcerned with a free press’s duty to challenge official versions of events, they fault newspapers and newsmagazines for failing to fall into lockstep in support of George W. Bush and his policies....

The main drawback of the blogging critics’ ignorance of or uninterest in journalistic tradition and practice is that it unleashes their own prejudices. They’re largely unfamiliar with the requirements imposed on reporters and editors by deadline haste and space constraints. They read an article through the prism of their own political mindset, and if they judge that its effect is to promote a "liberal agenda," they invariably assume that the effect is intentional.

Yep, this little asshole compared a media critic to Stalin.

He goes on, in another installment:

Press criticism of this nature passes muster only if you’re preaching to the choir. But then, these critics aren’t really interested in persuading the unpersuaded; they’re interested in reinforcing the prejudices of their followers through a chorus of mendacious commentary and rhetorical cant. They don’t wish to improve the free press, they wish to coerce it into supporting those with political power. Later, we’ll examine how this process works in detail, with Frey’s effort as an instructive text.

Well, this little sonofabitch has the "rhetorical cant" thing down pretty well.

And it turns out he also has a "chorus of mendacious commentary" to offer-- through a chorus of false identities.

Okay, he's a real douche. I feel like Dennis Hopper in True Romance, after looking into the history of the pimp/drug-runner his son murdered.

"The more I find out about this guy," Hopper says, "the more I think you did the one-hundred-percent right thing."

Always liked you, Patterico. Always will.

It's pretty funny. Patterico criticized this asshole, so he created false identities with which to show how much "the people" supported him. And then Patterico, of all people, figures that out and exposes his lies.

Man, he must be loving life just about now.

digg this
posted by Ace at 07:57 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Braenyard: ">>>>I think the rumor is they are have talks about ..."

San Franpsycho: "People who read [i]The Guardian[/i] embrace third- ..."

illiniwek: "Usually "bad instructions" are because they are wr ..."

The ARC of History!: "[i]Virtually nobody moves from a First World count ..."

AZ deplorable moron: "Damn it! Read the content. Rookie mistake. Posted ..."

CrotchetyOldJarhead: "Lock rebuild instructions!? Poorly written? Pictu ..."

AZ deplorable moron: "When the Guardian tells you *anything* believe the ..."

Idaho Spudboy: "I miss the time when we could unironically call ou ..."

The ARC of History!: "Pretty simple to define: People move (by the mi ..."

Archimedes: "It's so strange that Third Worlders all want to co ..."

Dr. Bone: ">>>For "rebuilding" to work like it did in Japan y ..."

Braenyard: ">>>I respect the hell out of what Musk did, but th ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64