Nancy Pelosi: The Supreme Court Is Safe, They Don't Need Any Protection

As previously reported, House Democrats are refusing to even schedule a vote on the bill that the Senate unanimously passed to provide the Supreme Court justices with federal protection.

Why are they doing this? Because House Democrats think it's cute to expose them to the violence of their antifa violence, to pressure them into changing their minds on Roe v. Wade.

This article is from May 12th. Almost a month ago.

House Democrats are undercutting bipartisan legislation to bolster security for Supreme Court justices as heated protests erupt outside their homes.

The Senate passed an emergency, bipartisan bill to beef up security for the justices and the Supreme Court building, sending it to the House on Monday night. Democrats in the House, however, don't appear to be eager to get the bill passed into law. Leadership members said on Wednesday they haven't even read the legislation, which is a single page, and they are now considering a new bill with an added provision that extends the security to the Court's 40-odd clerks--a provision sure to turn off Republicans.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D., N.Y.) said Tuesday that Democrats are "certainly going to look" at the bill, but declined to provide a timeline on when to expect a vote. House Democratic Caucus chairman Hakeem Jeffries (D., N.Y.) told reporters on Tuesday that he has not even read the single-page Senate bill.

"I assume the appropriate committee will review it," said Jeffries, who is favored to become the next Democratic speaker.

The lack of urgency from House Democrats comes as leftwing protests have erupted outside the Supreme Court and the homes of conservative Justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh in response to the leak of a draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade. On Saturday, a pro-life clinic's office was firebombed in Wisconsin. Those incidents, Republicans say, mean enhanced security is necessary as soon as possible before things escalate.

And now that there's been an actual attempt on a Justice's life -- just as predicted, and just as was foreseeable -- Nancy Pelosi says "LOL they're fine."

Maybe we should take away protection from Congress.

Note that this protester was peaceful -- but the Secret Service sure sprung into action to violently take her down.

Seems some Lives matter. Others don't.

The New York Times published the Supreme Court assassin story... on page A20.

Note that this is a Gun Violence Story, which the media usually loves.

And yet, suddenly -- no interest.

But the media has long covered up for their violent leftwing paramilitaries and street assassins.

In fact, the New York Times has previously encouraged the political assassination of Donald Trump, by publishing this assassination fantasy:

posted by Ace at 02:58 PM

| Access Comments