Ilhan Nur Said Elmi, aka "Ilhan Omar," When Asked If She Married Her Brother: "NOT TO MY KNOWLEDGE"

What I'm about to say is very obvious but you've come to expect that from me.

When Democrats are lying, and realize they're about to be exposed as lying, they begin shifting their denials from objective denials to mere subjective denials.

The Clintons, of course, are infamous for this.

Bill Clinton first denied, objectively, that he had had no sexual affair with Monica Lewinsky: "I never had sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky."

Later, when it was proven that he That Woman Miss Lewinsky had performed both fellatio and analingus on him, and that he had penetrated her vagina with a cigar, he claimed, in his mind -- subjectively -- that he didn't think that oral sex qualified as sex so in his completely subjective view of the world, they never had sex and he was telling the truth.

I mean, "oral sex" contains the word "sex" but Bill Clinton claims that, in his mind, in his subjective idiosyncratic worldview, he didn't know that "sex" included oral sex.

Because he was doing a lot of parsing and quibbling and evasion in his testimony in the Paula Jones suit, lawyers asked him something that he could not parse his way out of later: They asked him if he was ever even alone with Monica Lewinsky. He claimed, objectively, that he had never been alone with her. Never.

When it was proven that he was getting his chocolate starfish serviced by Lewinsky while using her as the world's sweatiest humidor, he claimed that because there were many people in the huge building called the White House, he didn't subjectively believe he was alone with Monica Lewinsky when she was blowing him in the Oval Office. "Maybe I was alone with her," he later conceded, "but I never thought we were."

Hillary Clinton perjured herself when she claimed, as an objective fact, that she never, ever worked on the Whitewater account. When it was proven that she had worked on it, and had committed perjury, she denied having subjective knowledge that the account was the Whitewater account. She claimed she only knew the account by its billing code, which was something like "WHC," and had no idea whatsoever that this referred to the Whitewater account. She is claiming that in none of the many hours she billed for Whitewater did she come across a single document containing the word "Whitewater."

And of course when she violated the public records act by denying the people of the United States the full documentation of all of her correspondence, by hiding her email communications in a secret bathroom server, she claimed she hadn't done this to keep her communications from the public. Why, she didn't do it for that reason! She just was in love with her Blackberry and this was the simplest way to handle Blackberry messages.

I didn't commit espionage by deliberately using an unsecure server which was invisible to the American public (and federal prosecutors) but very visible to the Chinese. I had no idea that would happen! I just wanted to keep my Recipes and Yoga Routines on a special server, for convenience.

No "intent!"

The Clintons' defense is always: We didn't Knowingly Know what we Doingly Did.

I could say that "All liars do this," but that's not true: It is insulting to the hearer to lie in this way, claiming that you didn't know what you were doing when you did it, so most liars avoid this high-risk Lie on Top of a Lie.

But Democrats know their supporters are vicious cultists who know they're lying but just need any possible excuse to support the lie, and so will never convict them of perjury if they play the We Didn't Knowingly Know What We Doingly Did Card -- "no intent!" -- so they do push this absurd non-defense.

So now we come to Ilhan "Omar," real name Ilhan Nur Said Elmi, who married her actual, biological brother, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi. She knows the feds have her DNA and can easily prove she is Amhed's brother, so she shifts from her prior objective denials -- it's absurd and racist to accuse me of marrying my brother -- to a mere subjective denial -- If I married my brother, I didn't know it was my brother when I married him.

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., denied Wednesday that she married her former husband, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, to commit immigration fraud and pushed back against claims that they are related.

But when asked if there's any familial relation with her ex-husband, Omar admitted, "Not to my knowledge."

The interview marked the Somali-born congresswoman's first time speaking with the media since federal agents searched her Washington, D.C., residence on Oct. 12. The congresswoman's office has not responded to Fox News Digital's repeated requests for comment regarding the investigations and raid on her home earlier this month.

I Didn't Knowingly Know I Was Brotherly Marrying My Brother.

Oops!

Oopsie!

How awkward!

There's other evidence for this. Ilhan Nur Said Elmi had a third child with her real Muslim husband. This is the one she was married to when she also married her brother. She later "divorced" Ahmed Nur Said Elmi when he stopped seeking a Green Card -- reportedly, he withdrew his application when they began questioning him about his marriage -- and remained married to her real Muslim husband.

Ahmed Nur Said Elmi commented on a Facebook post announcing her third child.

Scott Johnson reported on this strange comment. Elmi said, of this little girl, that she was "freshfrom the vagina" -- which is bizarre enough -- but also called her "my niece."

Niece. Meaning, the daughter of your sister.

But I'm sure that Ilhan Nur Said Elmi will claim that in her village of Somalia "niece" means something other than "the daughter of my sister," like "Respected Flower" or some bullshit.

Like when she used to call her real father -- not the fake one, Omar, but the real one, Elmi -- "father" in social media.

But then claimed that in her particular village of Somalia, "Father" is just a term of respect you use for any man older than you.

Seems kind of disrespectful to your real father to call other men "father."

But she'll claim it. See, she didn't know, subjectively, that "niece" means "the daughter of my sister" or that "father" means "my male biological parent."

And remember how cocky she would be when she denied this in the past? She would cackle with her mouth wide open like a fish on a dock and laugh at the "racists" making this claim.

Well, she's not laughing now, is she? She's in tears as she says "not to my knowledge."

"NOT TO MY KNOWLEDGE"&bodytext=What I'm about to say is very obvious but you've come to expect that from me. When Democrats are lying, and realize they're about to be exposed as lying, they begin shifting their denials from objective denials to mere subjective...&topic=world_news"> posted by Disinformation Expert Ace at 12:30 PM

| Access Comments