Good News: North Carolina Election Board Successfully Sued Into Removing Nearly 750,000 Ineligible Voters from Voter Rolls

Why was a lawsuit required to accomplish this? Why does a state have to be compelled into taking the most elementary steps towards securing an election against fraud?

These are rhetorical questions. We all know the answer.

George
@BehizyTweets

BREAKING: The North Carolina Election Board just revealed that they have removed 750,000 names from the voter rolls, including 130,000 dead people and 290,000 registrations that were duplicates

This comes after Republicans filed a lawsuit, showing 225,000 names were unlawfully allowed onto the rolls because of a failure "to collect certain required identification information before the registration forms were processed."

This purge of exactly 747,274 is just the number purged in the last 20 months. So, I don't believe it includes the names challenged by the Republican Party, which means they still have hundreds of thousands more to remove.

How does a state of 10 million end up with almost a million ineligible registrations in the first place? In elections, sometimes separated by a handful of votes, having almost a million ineligible names on the voter rolls, plus rampant mail-in voting, is an Election Fraudster's dream.

There is bad news out of Arizona. There are 98,000 potential non-citizens fraudulently registered to vote there, but the Democrat Secretary of State says he won't restrict these illegal voters to a "federal-only ballot."

If you're wondering what kind of gibberish that was, join the club. Yes, Arizona bans foreigners from voting in the statewide elections, but they've decided that illegal aliens can vote in federal elections. And the Democrat Secretary of State won't even restrict these likely criminal aliens from merely voting in the federal elections. They'll get to fraudulently vote in state contests, too.

A "coding oversight" in state software is calling into question the citizenship status of 100,000 registered Arizona voters, prompting the state's Democratic secretary of state to insist he will send out ballots to those affected anyway.

"I am unwilling to disenfranchise this many voters by limiting them, suddenly, and with little notice, to a federal-only ballot when none of them had actual notice of or blame for this issue," Secretary of State Adrian Fontes said during a Tuesday news conference. "We inherited this problem, we're on it, and we're going to fix it. It's as simple as that."

The mistake affects individuals who obtained their driver's licenses before October 1996 and subsequently received duplicates before registering to vote after 2004. Since 2005, Arizona has required proof of U.S. citizenship for voting in state and local elections. Without this proof, these voters would be considered "federal only" voters, permitting them to vote solely on presidential and congressional elections rather than the full ballot.

"We don't have any reason to believe that anyone in this gap is not an eligible voter," Fontes said. "We don't have any reason to believe that they're not eligible citizens in spite of the fact that we did find one. All we know is they fit into this category and all of this requires more research."

And in Georgia, the self-declared Party of Democracy -- actually the P. Diddy Freakoff Party -- is doing what true democrats do, contorting the law to stop citizens from voting for the candidates they like by knocking those candidates off the ballot.

The Georgia Supreme Court unanimously ruled Wednesday that presidential candidates Cornel West and Claudia De la Cruz do not qualify to appear on the state's ballot, meaning any votes cast for either candidate will not be counted. Democrats have launched lawfare efforts against the candidates in several states where they could potentially hurt Vice President Kamala Harris' chances of winning.

The court ruled that the presidential electors for both West and De la Cruz failed to submit proper petitions with the required signatures after Democrats challenged the candidates. The court ruled each elector was required to submit a separate petition with the required signatures needed to qualify for the ballot. That means each of West and De la Cruz's 16 electors needed to file individual petitions with 7,500 signatures. But both West and De la Cruz submitted only one petition following guidance from Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger.

"We now hold that each presidential elector for an independent candidate running for the office of President of the United States is a 'candidate' required to file a notice of candidacy under [state law] applies to each presidential elector for an independent candidate running for the office of President of the United States; and, under [state law], each presidential elector is therefore required to file a nomination petition in his or her own name 'in the form prescribed in Code Section 21-2-170,'" the court ruled.

The court ordered Raffensperger to place notices in polling locations warning that votes cast for West and De la Cruz will not count since new ballots without the candidates' names cannot be reprinted in time for the Nov. 5 election.

Meanwhile, of course, the Democrat-majority Supreme Court of Michigan has ruled that RFKJr. must remain on the ballot, despite him dropping out of the race and petitioning the state to remove his name.

But in Georgia? Candidates that want to be on the ballot, who might attract leftwing voters, are banned from the ballot.

And the left-controlled Wisconsin Supreme Court overturned a lower court decision to ban unsupervised, unmonitored ballot drop boxes. They're an open invitation to mass voter fraud, which is why the Democrat Party is absolutely determined to keep these crucial criminal props in operation.

posted by Ace at 03:52 PM

| Access Comments