David French Is Voting for Abortion Power Couple Harris and Walz and Is Loud and Proud About It

The Bee:

Anyone -- and I doubt this group is much larger than zero -- who bet that even King Champion of Effeminate Whiny Cucks David French would never, ever endorse the most leftwing presidential ticket in history just lost.

Of course, David French wants you to know he personally consulted with Jesus in making this decision. I have a feeling that David French did most of the talking, and told Jesus in no uncertain terms that He was doing it wrong.

The New York Times illustrates this latest exercise in self-exaltation with praying hands and, of course, a Bible:

French says he and Jesus knocked heads together and decided the best way to stop abortion was to vote for Kamala Harris -- the first vice president to visit a Planned Parenthood abortion chop-shop -- and gonzo abortionist Tim Walz, who accompanied Harris in her historic pilgrimage to the left's Holy of Holies.

Quick Hit:

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz joined Vice President Kamala Harris as she became the first sitting vice president to visit an abortion clinic, solidifying their pro-abortion stance ahead of the 2024 election.

Key Details:

Kamala Harris visited a Planned Parenthood clinic in St. Paul, Minnesota, marking the first time a sitting vice president has done so.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz accompanied Harris, showcasing their unified pro-abortion stance.

The visit was part of Harris's national abortion tour as she gears up for the 2024 presidential election.

The Unbeliever David French says the best way to stop abortion is, oddly enough, to vote like your right to abortion depends on it for the Abortion Power Couple of Harris and Walz, and just vote "down-ticket" for anti-abortion candidates who, get this, do not have the power to appoint Supreme Court justices or impose "reforms" on the Court like forcing older (conservative) justices to retire and packing the court with leftists.

No, he's serious.

He's a holy man, you know.

For example, how many Republicans would have predicted that voting for a Democrat would be the best way to confront violent Russian aggression and that the Republican would probably yield to a Russian advance? In many ways, the most concretely conservative action I can take in this election is to vote for the candidate who will stand against Vladimir Putin. By voting for pro-life politicians down ballot, I can help prevent federal liberalization of abortion law. But if a president decides to abandon Ukraine and cripple NATO, there is little anyone can do.

David French never actually seems to support these "down ballot" Republicans -- he accuses them of cowardice and complicity with Trump, then denounces them and endorses their Democrat opponents.

But sure, this time, he's going to really support Republicans who in turn support Trump.

Because abortion is just that important to him, doncha know.

Once again, David French attacks Trump for his "cruelty" -- in other words, David French continues to be spiraling over the fact that Trump's supporters called him a cuck on Twitter.

The only real hope for restoring a conservatism that values integrity, demonstrates real compassion, and defends our foundational constitutional principles isn't to try to make the best of Trump, a man who values only himself. If he wins again, it will validate his cruelty and his ideological transformation of the Republican Party. If Harris wins, the West will still stand against Vladimir Putin, and conservative Americans will have a chance to build something decent from the ruins of a party that was once a force for genuine good in American life.

Oh fuck you, heretical closet-case.

David French whines about Trump's "lying," but sees no lying at all from Scranton Joe or Kamala the Kocksucker.

No one tell him that her campaign is misleadingly rewriting media headlines to make them even more overtly pro-Kamala, while passing them off as real.

Even Axios objects (weakly) to this deliberate misinformation:

The Harris campaign has been editing news headlines and descriptions within Google search ads that make it appear as if the Guardian, Reuters, CBS News and other major publishers are on her side, Axios has found.

Why it matters: It's a common practice in the commercial advertising world that doesn't violate Google's policies, but the ads mimic real news results from Search closely enough that they have news outlets caught off guard.

According to Google's ad transparency center, the Trump campaign isn't running these types of ads, but this technique has been used by campaigns before.

The ads say that they are sponsored, but it's not immediately clear that the text that accompanies real news links is written by the campaigns and not by the media publication itself.

What they're saying: "While we understand why an organization might wish to align itself with the Guardian's trusted brand, we need to ensure it is being used appropriately and with our permission. We'll be reaching out to Google for more information about this practice," a Guardian spokesperson said.

Spokespeople for brands such as CNN, USA Today and NPR, whose links appeared in Harris for President ads, said they were unaware their brand was being featured this way.

Reality check: Google said the ads don't violate its rules, but platforms have in the past wrestled with whether this type of format can spread misinformation.

Facebook banned the ability for advertisers to edit text from Instant Article news links in their ads in 2017, citing its "continuing efforts to stop the spread of misinformation and false news."

Lincoln Brown wrote about this at PJM:

He also attacks Trump and his supporters for lying, particularly about the results of the last election. Yet he studiously avoids the rise in violent crime in Democratic quarters, Antifa, and the vicious behavior of antisemitic protesters on college campuses. He also makes this pithy comment about Trump: "Americans ended his term more divided than when it began."

Yes, Trump has been known for divisive rhetoric and speaking when he should have probably remained silent. However, Trump's critics habitually take his comments out of context and contort them beyond their original meaning. And progressive politicians and media luminaries have taken great pains to create as dire a picture as possible of Trump and his supporters, sometimes to the point of lying. The alarmist and incendiary comments from the Left are commonplace. One cannot extinguish the flames of division while simultaneously fanning them....

He finds French's claims that supporting the most extremist leftwing Marxist (and pro-abortion) ticket in American history is actually "supporting conservatism" baffling, unless...

Unless, of course, one has thrown one's lot in with the Left and has no choice but to keep repeating the talking points no matter the dictates of one's conscience. The last thing I saw from French was a piece in the New York Times that was essentially another screed about white conservatives and "The Lord of the Rings." My first thought was, "Dear God, are they still going on about this?" My next thought was how tough it must be to constantly find things to complain about regarding your old party.

What a laborious, tiresome task it must be to roll out yet another indictment of conservatives who don't think like you. These people have picked their horse and have no option but to ride it to the finish line.

Yes, this effeminate Nancy-boy geek just attacked the right for not understanding Tolkein the way David French understands it:

'The Lord of the Rings' Is Not the Far Right's Playground

He also can't stop baiting us into noting that he literally has the voice, mannerisms, bitchiness, and eye for trivial complaints of a leftwing woman by constantly asserting that he is the King of Masculinity and is here to tell us what Being a Man is all about:

He just attacked Trump and Dana White and Hulk Hogan for pushing a non-David-French-approved form of masculinity, you know, the kind of masculinity which has some testosterone and hot blood in it:

David French: There's more, and better, to masculinity than Hulk Hogan, Kid Rock and Dana White

Trumpist masculinity is rooted in grievance and anger. McRaven's message centers on honor and courage

The Democratic Party must join the battle for the hearts and minds of young men. It matters not just for this election, though the vast and growing gender gap means that disaffected men could hand Donald Trump the presidency. It matters for how we mentor young men, and it matters for how we view masculinity itself.

And yes, the Democrats can do it. Within the Kamala Harris coalition, there are men who can show a better way.

If you ever wondered whether the Republican Party sees itself as the party of men, I'd invite you to re-watch the last night of the Republican National Convention. Prime time featured a rousing speech by wrestling legend Hulk Hogan, a song by Kid Rock and a speech by Dana White, CEO of the Ultimate Fighting Championship -- all as warm-up acts before Trump delivered his acceptance speech. Republican manliness was the capstone of the convention.

But what kind of men were featured? They're all rich and powerful, and as a longtime fan of professional wrestling, I loved watching Hogan as a kid, but none of them are the kind of man I'd want my son to be....

We know all about Trump, but it's worth remembering some of his worst moments -- including a jury finding that he was liable for sexual abuse, his defamation of his sex-abuse victim, the "Access Hollywood" tape and the countless examples of his cruelly insulting the women he so plainly hates.

JD Vance is different. No one should denigrate his personal story. He has overcome great adversity, served his country honorably as a Marine and, by all accounts, is a good husband and father. But he now wears Trumpist masculinity like an ill-fitting suit. Last week, he was justifiably attacked for a 2021 interview with Tucker Carlson in which he declared that the country is run, "via the Democrats, via our corporate oligarchs, by a bunch of childless cat ladies." He identified Harris (who has two stepchildren) as just the kind of person he was talking about.

For a brief period last week, I thought Harris might answer the Trumpists with a man who puts to shame every person who took the stage that Thursday night. She was reportedly considering Adm. William McRaven -- a Navy SEAL, a former commander of U.S. Special Operations Command and one of the key architects of Operation Neptune Spear, the mission to kill Osama bin Laden -- as a potential running mate.

It's just amazing to me that a "man" who presents, at least, as gay (or "Questioning," certainly) absolutely refuses to stop talking about masculinity. It's like he's baiting everyone into saying the obvious -- dude, you're as feminine as the napkins Tim Walz stocks in boy's bathrooms, and I wouldn't want to bet on who's had more dick between you, you or your horrid hagwife -- so that he can sue us for defamation.

Being a man isn't about being tough-minded and willing to defend yourself, he wants us to know.

Being a man is about being soft, compliant, terminally-online, emotionally needy, catty, and forever stewing in Hurt Feelings.

posted by Disinformation Expert Ace at 05:00 PM

| Access Comments