Now Sweetdick's Lawyer Is Perjuring Himself, Claiming That All of His Statements About When the Affair Began Were Mere "Speculation" and He Has No Knowledge of Any Kind About the Affair

The hearing is live.

It's frustrating, because the state attorneys (defending Fani and Sweetdick) object to every single question and the judge keeps upholding the objections. Or he keeps telling the anti-Fani lawyer to reframe her questions and establish proper foundation, and she doesn't seem to be able to do so most of the time.

Ashleigh Merchant keeps asking "Did you tell me the affair started in 2019?" or similar questions, and the Fani lawyers object, claiming that she can't ask that question until she's determined that he had any knowledge of the question. And then he lies and says he has no knowledge.

So she can never ask "Why did you tell me about the beginning of the affair if you didn't know?"

These are all lies. Previously he allowed he had information about the affair but could not offer it up because it was learned in lawyer-client communications.

Now that the judge has said that the privilege doesn't apply to many facts, Terrence Bradley is just claiming he doesn't have information at all.

Then why did he previously assert lawyer-client privilege? If he didn't know before, he could have just said "I don't know."

Techno Fog @Techno_Fog

Witness Terrence Bradley:

Did Nathan Wade tell you they had sex at Fani Willis's office before she was DA?

"I don't recall"

This is testilying. This is perjury.

But it's working, in the sense that he just refuses to give any information up. All questions are either answered by "Lawyer-Client Privilege," "I have no personal knowledge," or "I don't know" or "I don't remember."

Greta Van Susteren @greta

I have never seen a witness on the witness stand who remembers less... are you watching the Fulton County Court hearing?

posted by Disinformation Expert Ace at 03:08 PM

| Access Comments