Ace: aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
It's still possible to get around this, but Microsoft keeps making it more difficult. And if your laptop finds and connects to a nearby free WiFi point, the usual options don't work.
(This is a problem I no longer have; the only WiFi networks I can see from my house are my own router and the solar arrays on my roof.)
They're not chips exactly - each one is technically a stack of eight individual chips - but they're not what we usually regard as memory modules, because there's no circuit board.
Anyway, bandwidth of a single thing is 1.2 terabytes per second, about 100 times faster that the fastest SSDs, and 10 times faster than high-speed dual-channel DDR5.
That's a lot of cores. They're "Efficiency" cores, so they have half the performance of Intel's "Performance" cores, but they're a quarter the size and use a quarter the power, so it's a fair tradeoff.
This CPU will arrive next year, and face off against AMD's 128 core Zen 5 and 192 core Zen 5c CPUs. Performance will be similar on some workloads, though the AMD chips will mop the floor with Intel on anything that uses AVX-512, because Intel's Efficiency cores don't have AVX-512.
It's pretty decent, though not remarkable. If you want to play games without ray tracing, it's a solid pick. If you want to play games with ray-tracing, less so, though it's not embarrassingly bad.
For accelerating Blender and AI workloads you're definitely better off with an Nvidia card. And if you want to run professional 3D software like CAD, it's somewhere between 8% and 1500% faster than Nvidia.
Nvidia deliberately limits their gaming cards on professional workloads, so there are cases where entry-level AMD cards outrun even an RTX 4090.
Not an entirely frivolous question. The Supreme Court has been hearing oral arguments in the Netchoice cases involving Texas and Florida laws forbidding viewpoint discrimination by social networks.
Both sides are arguing largely by analogy, so the justices have been having fun forcing them to defend their analogies.