Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups






















« Bad Guy Killed By Good Woman With a Gun | Main | Racist Teacher Who Thought She Could Publicly Post About Wanting to Commit Violence Against Another Race Without Consequence, Sees Consequences »
August 10, 2023

FaceBook Objected to Biden's Demands for Censorship, But Censored Vax Skeptics Anyway, Because They Need the Government's Help in Protecting Their Consumer Spying Operations in Europe

FaceBook's whole business model is "data-mining" their customers and then selling that data to advertisers.

Europe has been attempting to ban the process.

FaceBook has long supported leftwing Democrats, both with direct donations and $350 million+ investments in ballot harvesting and GOTV efforts in Democrat districts. And they were now calling on the Democrats they lease-with-an-option-to-buy to defend them against Europe's attempts to bring the FaceBook data-mining operations to heel.

When Joe Biden demanded that FaceBook censor people talking about their covid vax injuries, FaceBook objected, pointing out that attempting to censor such stories would just bring more attention to them. (They don't seem to have objected on principle, just that the censorship would not be a productive way to achieve Regime goals.)

However, they censored this material anyway. Internal emails show that FaceBook said they had more important matters at stake, specifically "data flows."

What did they mean by that? They meant they had to appease the Biden Administration so that the Biden Administration would protect their data-mining operations around the world. These are the "data flows" they meant -- the data flowing from FaceBook users to FaceBook and then to advertisers.

And David French continues insisting that Biden is merely "jawboning" social media companies to censor conservatives and other dissenters, and has every constitutional right to do so.

The indispensable Michael Shellenberger:

The Biden White House did not violate the First Amendment when it requested that Facebook censor information on Covid's origin and vaccine side effects, say many policymakers, journalists, and legal experts. Rather, White House officials were simply expressing their free speech rights, and Facebook executives were free to ignore White House requests.

But newly released internal emails show that Facebook executives felt pressure to comply with White House demands in order to resolve a European Union ban on the social media company's ability to transfer the data of European users to its servers in the United States.

In July 2021, after a White House official demanded that Facebook censor more information, Facebook's Vice President of Global Affairs and Communications, Nick Clegg, asked his colleagues to comply. The reason? Because of "the bigger fish we have to fry with the Administration -- data flows etc..."

By "data flows," Clegg was referring to the EU's demand that Facebook stop transferring European user data -- which Facebook advertisers value for targeting customers -- to the United States.

The dispute was no small matter. In May of this year, EU regulators fined Meta, Facebook's parent company, a record $1.3 billion for breaking the EU's privacy regulations. The regulator said that Meta had violated a 2020 ruling by the EU's highest court.

Two months later, on July 10, 2023, the Biden Administration and European Union announced a deal, the "EU-US Data Privacy Framework."

The series of events suggests a quid pro quo. Facebook would bow to White House requests for censorship in exchange for its help with the European Union.

"This is a gross violation of the First Amendment," Columbia Law School Professor Philip Hamburger told Public, "not only because it involves what the Supreme Court considers 'coercion,' but also because it's equally unconstitutional for the government to seek censorship through contract or conspiracy. And that's what happened here."

The White House wasn't the only entity demanding that Facebook censor. NGOs and journalists from NBC and the New York Times were also pressuring Facebook to censor more. In response, Facebook executives weighed the radical "blackholing" measure, which blocks links to external web sites without informing users.

But it's clear from the newly released emails that Facebook executives felt the greatest pressure from the White House and that they feared the White House would hurt them in other ways.

Until now, critics of government demands for greater Facebook censorship have focused on the White House's threat to revoke Facebook's Section 230 status, which immunizes the company from many forms of liability.

But the new emails point to a form of government leverage over the platform that has been ignored until now: the EU demand on Facebook to stop data flows from the EU to the US, and the conditional willingness of the White House to push back against it.

This is the final proof needed to establish that FaceBook was acting as an agent of the United States in censoring the Regime's enemies. There wasn't merely the threat of stripping their s.230 protection. (Or the threat, which I always mention, that the government will stop protecting these illegal monopolies and tart prosecuting them.)

There was also a direct bribe, a straight payoff: Censor for us and we'll fight for your right to mine the personal information of your users for advertising use.

FaceBook straight-up makes that connection themselves: "we have bigger fish to fry with the [Biden] Administration... data flows..."

They admit in their internal emails that they didn't want to buck the Biden Administration on censorship because they needed their help in protecting their core business of selling user information.

And David French continues babbling that this is just a case of the US government asking a completely-independent third party to please ban some "disinformation"...

And so, frankly, does the treasonous, vile corporate wing of the GOP.

Also very important: It was the criminal news media which was demanding the White House in turn apply pressure on social media companies to censor conservatives and vaccine dissidents.

I've long pointed out that CNN and NBC, in particular, maintain what I call "Deplatforming Officers." It is the job of the arrogant, face-missing-a-fist fascist Ben Collins at NBC to make demands that more and more Americans be censored and silenced. It was the job of Brian Stelter to do that at CNN; now the job is wholly in control of his former Junior Deplatforming Officer, Oliver Darcy.

They have no other job. Their jobs consist of finding people that liberals want to #Cancel and then using all the power of billion-dollar media companies to pressure social media platforms to cancel them.

[W]hy was the Biden White House so determined to censor Facebook in the first place?

Until the Facebook Files, the answer had been that they wanted people to take the vaccine. The White House believed all the anti-vaccine information on Facebook was contributing to "vaccine hesitancy."

But now, the Facebook Files reveal that Facebook executives knew censoring disfavored vaccine views would backfire and explained to White House officials that censoring such views would violate established norms around freedom of speech. But the White House demanded more censorship, anyway.

...

"We are facing continued pressure from external stakeholders, including the white house and the press, to remove more COVID-19 vaccine-discouraging content," [FaceBook employee] Birch wrote to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and COO Sheryl Sandberg in an April 2021 email.

Facebook executive Nick Clegg initially attempted to defend his staff. "I countered that removing content like that would represent a significant incursion into traditional boundaries of free expression in the US," wrote Clegg.

Clegg wrote that given what is at stake -- which we can assume included those precious "data flows" -- it was critical that FaceBook bow to the Biden Administration's demands.

But he eventually caved in. "Given what is at stake here," he wrote, "it would also be a good idea if we could regroup to take stock of where we are in our relations with the WH [White House], and our internal methods too."

corporatemediademandcensorship.jpg

The gross and ancient toad Taylor Lorenz also spends a lot of her time dialing up social media companies' officers and demanding the censor her enemies.


digg this
posted by Ace at 05:21 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
kallisto: "Oh yeah, I forgot…I choose to send prayers u ..."

whig's phone: "Tcn, Tis true. Been watching short YouTube vid ..."

Commissar of Plenty and Lysenkoism in Solidarity with the Struggle : " you are gay homosexual who murders black male pro ..."

BurtTC: "I’m not wasting one moment of my time prayin ..."

JackStraw: ">>We're going to find that lots of agencies were i ..."

Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd: "I just assumed raising a glass is what caused the ..."

J.J. Sefton: "301 It's a shame we can't vote California out of t ..."

exdem13 FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT: "Ach, Pelosi landed on her butt, not her head. Oh w ..."

fd: "Now if Schumer would just choke on a bag of dicks, ..."

Dantes: "we need term limits. The factions which are creat ..."

BurtTC: "Either way, I will raise a glass to the news. Pos ..."

garrett: ">>That's like a text book description of Starlink. ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64