Ace: aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
As a rule of thumb, CPU performance rises with the square root of the issue width, and complexity and transistor count (and also power consumption) rises with the square of the issue width, so to increase performance by 59% without increasing the clock speed Apple would need to make a chip more than six times larger using six times the power.
Increasing the clock speed by the same amount would have similar effects on power consumption.
And both approaches have limits where requirements zoom off the charts for minimal gains. You can see this in existing chips, where the 170W Ryzen 7900X is only 7% faster than the 65W 7900 non-X model.
The RP2040 is the chip in the Raspberry Pi Pico. It has no video circuitry at all, but it is flexible enough nonetheless to generate and encode an HDMI signal.
That keeps the chip pretty busy, so Pimoroni has added a second RP2040 to act as the CPU while the first is being the the video chip.
Each chip has 256k of RAM, more than enough for old-school games, though the included language of choice is MicroPython rather than Basic.
AMD launched the more expensive 16 core 7950X3D first, knowing that everyone would buy the cheaper 8 core 7800X3D if it were available. At $449 it averages 20% faster in AMD's admittedly selective benchmarks than Intel's $589 13900K, while also using much less power.
It's slower for heavily multi-threaded tasks - if you want to game and also run particle accelerator data analysis you should go for the 7950X3D. Unless you live above the Arctic Circle where the 13900K's furnace-like qualities would be a net win.