British (Sussex) Police Warning People They Might Be Subject to Arrest If They Correctly Refer to the Biological Sex of a Male Transgender Convicted of Molesting Children

He molested children, then, later, "transitioned" into being a "woman."

The Sussex police call him a "woman" in their report.

A Labour Party member -- not an MP, just a member of the party ==and, I'm going to assume, a feminist who is not down with pretending that male sex crimes are the fault of women objected:

This is happening a lot, not just in the UK, but in the US too. Suddenly crimes which have historically only been perpetrated by men, such as taking out your penis on a bus or subway and masturbating, are being recorded in official crime statistics as being committed by "women."

Ryan Long commented on this: "Yeah, ladies! Finally on the board! Represent!"

And of course crimes like forcible r@pe and molestation, which are usually committed by men, are suddenly getting a good representation from "female" perpetrators.

Even if you accept the claim that this person is a woman now, he was not a woman at the time he sexually molested this children. He was a man then. (And, many would say, remains a man.) So why is this categorized as a female crime?

The Sussex Police are the enforcers of the insanities of the globalist neoliberal police state -- and rather than answer this woman's question, or explain themselves, they immediately resorted to threatening her with prosecution for "hate."

The hate directed at a convicted child molester.

I copied another exchange, which I can now not find, and the Sussex Police have deleted the tweets. You can see the exchanges, and the missing tweets, here.

When Clare King asked them to clarify if they were threatening her with arrest, and if she had the right to say that a biological man was a biological man, they refused to say she had that right or that she wasn't going to be arrested. Instead, they told her to familiarize herself with the laws regarding online hate speech.

Under pressure, they have now issued an apology.

How long do they think we're going to peacefully accept being made prisoners-who-committed-no-crimes by lunatic, corrupt governments and their thuggish Gestapos?

I know a screencap of this exchange is on Twitter. I thought I copied it. If you have it, let me know.

From yesterday's Quick Hits: British cops now threatening people with arrest for carrying Russian flags, because "we are at war."

Are they at war? Did the UK declare war? I don't remember that.

I don't remember the US declaring war either, but Non-President Biden keeps saying things like that, too.

And he says that means we have to be extra-vigilant about the Traitors In Our Midst.

Note: "Historic sexual offenses" are a category of crimes in the UK, meaning sex crimes that happened a while ago. Meaning, not fresh crimes. I think what they're getting at is crimes committed against children which are not reported until those children are grown.

Here's a reference:

What is an historic offence?

Historic sexual offences are any sexual crime such as rape, sexual assault or child sexual abuse which took place some time ago.

They do not have to be 30 or 40 years ago. It could be for example 2014 or 2010.

posted by Ace at 04:43 PM

| Access Comments