Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!
Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
|
« Sunday Overnight Open Thread (6/19/22) |
Main
| The Morning Report - 6/20/22 »
June 20, 2022
Daily Tech News 20 June 2022
Top Story
- We know that Intel's high-end 12th generation (and also 11th, 10th, and 9th generation) desktop parts are big expensive power-hungry monsters, but what about their low-end chips? How does the $129 Core i3-12100 stack up? (Tom's Hardware)
Very nicely, as it turns out. It's a 4-core / 8-thread CPU with none of the new Efficiency cores to complicate things, running at a maximum speed of 4.3GHz. That's a lot slower than the 12900K at 5.2GHz, but it has a maximum power consumption of 89W vs. 241W on the 12900K.
And while it's only a four-core chip, it's not slow. It comes close to matching my old Ryzen 1700 desktop - an eight core system. And easily beats the 11th-gen laptop I'm typing this on.
If you want a desktop system that is cheap but fast enough to be practical, this - or the $199 six core i5-12400 if you need a little more oomph - is a good choice.
Tech News
- Consciousness is computation. (GitHub)
Yes, I know that the headline of the article disagrees, but the article is retarded.
The entire argument presented is that consciousness can't be computation because consciousness involves qualia, where qualia are defined as whatever is left over when you take away every part of consciousness that can be explained by computation.
Which is a bit like defining art as what is left when you subtract the paint, the brushwork, the canvas, and the frame from a painting. It sounds profound but doesn't actually mean anything.
As Daniel Dennett noted many years ago, qualia don't exist. Philosophers refuse to admit this because even burger-flipping requires real-world skills.
- So if computers can be conscious, is Google's LaMDA an example? (ZDNet)
Probably, but that doesn't mean a whole lot. You can be conscious but still dumber and less useful than a toaster, as the White House Press Corps proves daily.
It's not sentient, which is a somewhat higher bar, but then neither are many of the people on Twitter much of the time. I don't know if it regresses into obviously sphexish behaviour, which is the definitive strike against claims of sentience, but then humans do that, and not just on Twitter either.
- Is the Samsung 980 Pro any good? (Serve the Home)
Yes. It's not MLC (2-bit per cell) like previous pro models, but it is good.
- What's new in the Ada 2022 standard? (AdaCore)
Not that much by the look of things. Ada is a very capable language already and doesn't need a whole lot of new stuff, so this is good.
You can convince it, like JavaScript, that "5" + 3 = 53 but "5" - 3 = 2, but it induces enough pain along the way that you will hopefully reconsider.
Disclaimer: Out of cheese error. Redo from start.
posted by Pixy Misa at 04:56 AM
| Access Comments
|
Recent Comments
Recent Entries
Search
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs
|