Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups






















« The Morning Rant: Minimalist Edition | Main | AP: You Ugly Americans, Always Expressing Gratitude and Saying “Thank You” »
November 23, 2021

Looming Losses for House Democrats [Dave in Fla]

The 2022 election season is not going well for Democrats. Historical trends already point to significant losses in the House, where the Democrats only hold a 5 seat edge (as of last week). On historical trends alone, the Democrats would lose their majority. However, current polling is showing that if the election were today, the Democrats would face losses worse than the 1994 and 2010 losses.

Congressional generic ballot polling is a recent trend, only being conducted as a key part of election polling since 2012. Prior to that only a few polling firms, such as Washington Post/ABC and Gallup, polled the question. Prior to 1980, it wasn't polled at all.

The table below shows both the historical trends in the first year of a presidency, and the generic ballot results prior to the elections. With the exception of Bush in 2002, a president in his first midterm always loses seats in the House. Of the seven examples since 1970, the minimum loss has been 8 seats. Even without the current political climate, the Democrat hold on the House is almost certain to be lost.

Historic Congressional Results.JPG


The other thing to note about these polls is that they skew Democrat. It is very rare for them to show a Republican preference. The one time that they did, we had the 2010 blowout of 63 seats. I took a look at the historic performance of the ABC poll.

ABC Poll Performance.JPG

This poll does show a correlation to the results of the congressional elections. High numbers for the Democrats have predicted Democrats wins, low numbers for the Democrats have predicted Republican wins. Even in 2010 the ABC poll was showing a D+5 predicted result.

What is unprecedented is this poll is currently showing a R+10 result. The last time Republicans led on this question was September 2010, where they held a 1 point lead. And this poll could very well still be underreporting the Republican advantage. Rich Baris started polling congressional preference in September, finding a 1 point Republican advantage, where the ABC poll showed a 14 point Democrat advantage during the same time period.

It isn't just the ABC poll showing this result. Recent polls from Quinnipiac, Rasmussen, Suffolk, and Emerson are showing the same unprecedented Republican congressional ballot leads. Take a look at the RCP average over the last few months.

2022 Trends.JPG

This graph shows three trend periods since the summer. From June until August, the Republicans were slowly gaining ground on the Democrats. Then with the passage of the Infrastructure bill in the Senate in September, congressional preference dropped like a rock for both parties. In October, the Republicans began to gain ground again, and then with the vaccine mandates hitting the entire national work force in November, Republicans took an unheard of lead.

If we had a normal electoral environment, we would be talking about gains of 80+ seats, and certainly equal to the 60+ seats gained in 2010. But these are not normal times, since hyper partisanship and election fraud are the current election constants. Election reforms in states like Florida, Georgia, and Texas will guarantee significant Republican wins in those states. Walker is very likely to beat Ossoff in Georgia, DeSantis will cruise to an easy win, Charlie Crist's seat will switch back to Republican, and Guillen in Texas saw the writing on the wall in the Hispanic community and switched parties.

In the past, we could also expect major swings in other states like California. However, with the institution of legalized ballot harvesting and universal mail-in ballots, the opportunity for fraud in that state (and others like Colorado) are so significant that candidates need to overcome much higher margins of fraud than before. Even so, districts like CA-16 are very competitive this year, where Biden won the district by over 10 points.

There is also a trend where incumbent Republicans are facing a tough primary campaign. This is where Trump's influence is being felt. The Trump endorsement is the Republican voters' top issue for supporting a candidate. Youngkin could not have won Virginia without it. In Georgia, polling showed that either Kemp or Jones would win with Trump's endorsement. Now that he has endorsed David Perdue, Perdue is leading. There are also candidates who were not interested in politics at all, until the election was stolen in 2020. Joe Kent in WA-3 is running against Jaime Beutler, who voted to impeach Trump. Vance in Ohio wouldn't be in the race at all. And Murkowski in Alaska is in serious trouble, even with the NSCC spending millions to help reelect her.

While the primary beneficiary of current voter anger is going to be the GOPe, who have done nothing except sell out their base for years, there will be winners who have deep populist convictions and will buck the status quo. There will be more Marjorie Green's and Lauren Boebert's next year.

Back in March a question was asked regarding the Democrat plans to win the midterms. The Democrats had planned to run on a booming economy and world stability.

Let that sink in.

After stealing the election, they really thought that the policies they were going enact would result in economic improvement, and that the world would settle down and love us. And the voters would then forget about 2020 and just return to pre-2016 voting patterns. To be fair, the voters were willing to do so, all the Biden Administration had to do was continue the Trump policies. Instead, they botched Afghanistan, we have unprecedented inflation, never ending COVID emergencies, massive supply chain disruption, and vaccine mandates threatening the jobs of millions right before Christmas.

Even the Never Trump neocons thought Democrat policies would lead to prosperity and peace.

We are ruled by idiots.

They have sown the wind and will reap the whirlwind. It's just a crying shame that the guy who will benefit the most is Kevin McCarthy.

digg this
posted by Open Blogger at 12:15 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
m: "... like the Ligma Johnson guy who was "fired" fro ..."

m: "The Luigi protestors: I wonder if they're comedian ..."

tcn in AK: "As a parent you are supposed to care for your chil ..."

[/i]blaster: "[i]The Son who is living in your home, because oth ..."

tcn in AK: "The Christmas Spirit hit me two weeks ago with a n ..."

pookysgirl sez NEIN: "Shortly after Elon Musk tweeted that only AfD can ..."

betflik168: "Hi there! This is my 1st comment here so I just wa ..."

scampydog: "Yes. And he's was too young to die. Posted by: 13 ..."

Nightwatch: "Good Lord, awake to late this ONT. Informed I a ..."

Scarymary: "Taking a man on as a project to be improved is a p ..."

Nightwatch: "234 AAAHHhh. I think that sweet and somewhat ro ..."

BourbonChicken: ">I was going to say something about that presuppos ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64