Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups






















« Mid-Morning Art Thread | Main | Happy Indigenous Peoples Day! »
October 11, 2021

The Morning Rant

talking ape.jpg

THE PROGRESSIVE PLAYBOOK

I often complain about such-and-such being something "out of the progressive playbook", as if there is a text called "The Progressive Playbook" floating around. I really should start collecting these instances and then perhaps one day I will publish a compendium of every progressive tactic, every misdirection, every false equivalence, every circular argument, every strawman, every causal fallacy, every special pleading, every argumentum ad hitlerum, and I could probably fill an additional volume on their incessant motte-and-baileying.

Yes, perhaps one day I will write such a compendium.

But today is not that day.

No, today I am going to complain about yet another low and dishonest progressive tactic, one that is probably the most low and dishonest:

From this tweet commenting on some older Catholic bishops (and the pope!) looking with disapproval on the surprising preference of many young Catholics for the TLM (traditional Latin Mass), and a couple of screen shots were attached:


meme 20211011 00a.jpg

Also, this one:


meme 20211011 00b.jpg

Where to begin? First, the smug, arrogant attitude of condescension that drips from both these quotes is absolutely infuriating. If someone said that to me in real life, I'd have to resist a strong temptation to bop him on the beak. Because the shorter version of each of these is "anyone who disagrees with me has psychological problems", i.e. is insane.

The main problem here is that this tactic skips a step. That is, nothing in either statement proves that the young people who prefer the Latin Mass are, in fact, in error. They just assume the error and then explain why the error exists.

This goes back to the postmodern style (which derives from Marx) of 'deconstruction' which deals with counter-arguments by claiming some other reason for them. In Marx's case, it's because of "class interests" and in modern times, this has been expanded to include race, gender, and sexual orientation.

But C.S. Lewis caught on to this dodge as early as the 1940s. In his book, God in the Dock and Other Essays, there is an unfinished essay titled 'Bulverism' or, the Foundation Of 20th Century Thought where he lays it all out. Lewis lived his life in academia, so he saw the first sprouting of postmodernism/deconstructionism first hand, although I don't think he knew it by those names. 'Bulver' was the name of a fictitious character he whimsically invented to account for the origin of this 'debunking' (his phrase) style of argument. I think Lewis' analysis is prophetic:

I find the fruits of his discovery almost everywhere. Thus I see my religion dismissed on the grounds that ‘the comfortable parson had every reason for assuring the nineteenth century worker that poverty would be rewarded in another world’. Well, no doubt he had. On the assumption that Christianity is an error, I can see early enough that some people would still have a motive for inculcating it. I see it so easily that I can, of course, play the game the other way round, by saying that ‘the modern man has every reason for trying to convince himself that there are no eternal sanctions behind the morality he is rejecting’. For Bulverism is a truly democratic game in the sense that all can play it all day long, and that it gives no unfair privilege to the small and offensive minority who reason.

Once can see the advantage of adopting such an approach: arrogantly dismissing as irrational those who don't share your views relieves you of both the responsibility of having to actually engage with them, and the burden of having to think through your own. It's such a lazy and dishonest rhetorical tactic. Ultimately, you're wrapping yourself up in an impermeable bubble that no reason or logic can ever penetrate.

In addition, I thought the "true love is not rigid" line to be especially smelly. Apparently, accusing young people of being mentally ill because they prefer a different form of the Mass is not the least bit rigid. Every bit of shade the post-modernist throws at traditional thinking can be thrown right back at them. And they have to do a lot of convoluted special pleading to avoid stepping on the flaming bag of dog poo they've placed on their own porch.

In my opinion, if I was a Catholic prelate, a shepherd of the flock, I think I'd want to know why many of the younger generation Catholics are attracted to the old Latin Mass. To not seriously engage this question, to immediately dismiss a sizeable portion of the flock as silly or demented, seems, I dunno, kind of rigid to me.

And the task of collecting and classifying the taxonomy of progressive arguments may be made much easier by the fact that most of it boils down to name-calling.

Finally, given the advanced age of the pope, I like this response comment: "I can be retarded much longer than they can take their heart and cholesterol meds."





meme 20211011 01.jpg



Thanks For the Good News!

meme 20211011 02.jpg



Wouldn't It Have Been Easier Just To Retract the Article?

meme 20211011 03.jpg




meme 20211011 04.jpg




meme 20211011 05.jpg




meme 20211011 06.jpg




meme 20211011 07.jpg




meme 20211011 09.jpg



Don't Leave Home Without It:

meme 20211011 10.jpg




meme 20211011 11.jpg



Who Dis:

who dis 20211011a1.jpg

Photo 2
Photo 3 (cheeky!)
Photo 4 (busty!)
Photo 5
Photo 6 (busty!)
Photo 7



For the 'Ettes:

who dis 20211011b1.jpg

Photo 2 (shirtless!)
Photo 3
Photo 4
Photo 5

(bonus shirtless)



Friday Who Dis: Supposedly, South African-born actress Glynis Johns is one of the figures shown in the photo on the Led Zeppelin II album cover, but that's not known for certain. Perhaps best known for his role on The High Chaparral TV show, Cameron Mitchell starred with Ms. Johns in the 1957 tearjerker All Mine To Give, which, according to imdb.com, was alternately titled The Day They Gave Babies Away.



Today's Edition Of The Morning Rant Is Brought To You By Sourdough Bread:

sourdough bread 01.jpg
(Click for bigger bread)

Sourdough recipe available here.

digg this
posted by OregonMuse at 11:16 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Commissar Hrothgar (hOUT3) ~ Next year in Corsicana - again! ~ [/i][/b][/u][/s]: "Twasn't me that now has an appointment with the ba ..."

Braenyard - some absent friends are more equal than others: "His daddy was a pistol and he was a son of a gun. ..."

Tonypete: "[/i] Good evening Italicans! ..."

Commissar Hrothgar (hOUT3) ~ Next year in Corsicana - again! ~ [/i][/b][/u][/s]: "Argggh! [/i] ..."

Pug Mahon, Pledge in a Beanie: "The chill I just felt was knowing that I am LAST! ..."

Commissar Hrothgar (hOUT3) ~ Next year in Corsicana - again! ~ [/i][/b][/u][/s]: "Nice one TRex! ..."

AlaBAMA DeButts: "Italican noods ..."

JohnFNotKerry: "italics ..."

mindful webworker - so they say: "Overnight thread, overnight thread Pops up when I ..."

AlaBAMA DeButts: "Egads! Italicans! ..."

JohnFNotKerry: "wow 5th ..."

Pug Mahon, Pledge in a Beanie: " Doof! Howdy, amigo. Posted by: Notorious BFD at ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64