The Bulwark Again Defends CRT, Claims That Anyone Who Wants to Stop Public School Teachers from Teaching Racial Inferiority Is Himself Racist

The Conservamatating Conservamatism site "The Bulwark" is once again supporting the teaching of Critical Race Theory in public, taxpayer-funded schools, and peddling the leftwing talking point that if citizens weigh in on what the schools they're funding are to teach their children, that's "cancel culture" and "censorship."

They -- specifically, Charlie "3-Wives" Sykes, a noted strict social conservative except when he's serially cheating on his serial wives -- are furthermore claiming that it's racist to oppose Critical Race Theory.

Because, as this genius who is definitely not servicing the account of a leftwing donor posits, if you were not racist, you'd ban the teaching of Marxism itself. By restricting the ban to the Critical Race Theory part of applied Marxism, you "give the game away" that you just hate black people.

Unlike noted White Ally Charlie Sykes. Who I'll bet has not even spoken to ten black people, outside of the service industry, in his whole whitebread, serial-adultery life.

So they are playing a (race) card, not making an actual argument. They may not understand what it means, but they know that this is a way for them to push back (and shut down) debates about racial injustice. Any concerns about the history of racism or police violence can be simply dismissed: "See, what you're doing is Critical Race Theory."

I regret to inform you that this includes simply making sh*t up.

Some of the allegations Rufo laid out... are not supported by the evidence he produces, and others are stretched beyond the facts.

...

If the concern was really simply political correctness, their agenda would be far wider, wouldn't it? But by focusing solely on critical race theory, they sort of give away the game, don’t they?

True Conservatives always play the "Racist!" card to silence critics of leftwing agenda items.

I wonder which deep-pocketed leftist commissioned this particular hit.

Twitchy's SarahD. points out that the Washington Post hit piece that Sykes is relying on -- a True Conservative always trusts obvious leftwing hit-pieces from the leftwing corporate media, you know -- has been corrected, I mean, "clarified" do to its numerous errors.

They didn't retract the piece. They would never admit they wrote a hit piece based in lies. They simply "clarify" all the falsehoods away.

And Charlie "3-Wives" Sykes happily uses this leftwing hit-piece to make his own left-wing hit-piece.

You know who else agrees that a rejection of Critical Race Theory is rooted in racism?

Noted True Conservative Rashida Tliab:

And also, Noted True Conservative Don LeMon:

I wonder if they'll be inviting Noted True Conservatives Rashida Tliab and Don LeMon to their "Meeting of the Concerned" cocktail hours.

Note that, like the left, which they are now firmly a part of (and being paid by for their propaganda), they deny that the actual cancelation and censorship of free speech is cancelation and censorship, and then go on to claim that something which is plainly not censorship of private speech, but rather citizen control over a very important part of their government is cancel culture/censorship.

I guess when you vote against Democrats, that's also cancel culture.

David French peddles this line. Having again taken a meme from his leftwing clique-mates. He claims that demanding that tech monopolies, which are monopolies and subject to special rules, stop engaging in illegal cartel activity and stop leveraging their market dominance to pick winners and losers in another business (such as political speech), is "cancel culture" performed by right-wing "SJWs" forcing Google and FaceBook to "Bake the cake, bigot."

Meanwhile, he is fully supportive of the fake, weak religious liberty acts which result in Christians being harassed and forced to bake "gender transition" cakes.

Even though those bake shops are obviously not monopolies, and the people seeking Satan cakes and gender transition cakes can get them from dozens of bakers. They just want to force believing Christians (who are themselves a religious minority in this country) to bend the knee.

French would never support a big-tech-style blanket immunity to lawsuit for believing Christians refusing counter-doctrinal demands. He likes the religious liberty laws being very weak.

The tech monopolists get absolute immunity, believing Christians get ten years of legal harassments followed by a judge ordering them to bake the cake.

There is a hypocrisy in how these two cases are handled -- the tech monopolies are treated as if their conscience matters and is absolute, and Christians are treated as inferiors who have to beg their betters to please, please, please don't force them to violate their religious conscience.

But sure, Dave, it's right-wing SJWism to point this out.

Are you still pretending to fight for True Conservative Principles or have you dropped that grift by now, now that you're publishing The Conservative Case for Critical Race Theory pieces?

Here's what these people are defending, nay, affirmatively agitating in favor of. It's disgusting.

Kyle Sheidler has some thoughts on Charlie "3-Wives" Sykes suggestion that if we don't like Critical Race Theory, we should just make Marxism illegal:

posted by Ace at 12:20 PM

| Access Comments