Sponsored Content
« Newsmax Beats the Chris Wallace's Leftwing Opinions Network for First Time Ever | Main | Tucker Carlson: We Reached Out to Eric Swalwell to Ask If, As Has Been Reported, He Had Sex with Confirmed Chinese Spy Fang Fang;
Swalwell Told Us He Could Not Answer, Because the Answer Might be "Classified" »
December 09, 2020

Monopoly Google's Monopoly Video Platform YouTube Sends Out a Warning to All YouTubers: If You Even Discuss Election Fraud, We Will Ban You From the Platform

And the GOP continues to defend, promote, and do special immigration favors for the tech leviathans imposing technofascism on the country.

Our policies disallow content alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the result of a historical US presidential election.

They say that while they have allowed some "discussion" about election fraud when the election was, they claim, "current," now that the safe harbor deadline has come, any content claiming election fraud in a "historical" (past) election is now a violation and will be deleted.

Funny, they never banned anyone for claiming "Russia stole the election" even after the Mueller Report proved in 2019 that no such stealing took place.

As such, starting today, we will remove new content uploaded on or after December 9, 2020, alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 US presidential election. [Emphasis in original.] For example, we will remove videos claiming that a presidential candidate won the election due to widespread software glitches or counting errors.

Stacey Abrams and her leftwing "journalist" supporters were permitted to continue alleging the election was "stolen" from her due to unproven claims about "voter suppression" -- I assume that by specifying they will ban content about fraud or counting errors, they are stealthily implying that Democrats will continue being permitted to claim every election was stolen from them due to either "voter suppression" or "Russia collusion."

The leftwing theories of vote theft will be allowed to survive and thrive.

How is the media reacting to this technofascist attack on free speech?

Oh, they're very critical of YouTube.

They are critical of YouTube for having allowed discussion of vote fraud for a month. They are chiding YouTube for just banning it now.

But the US media is very supportive of banning all the speech that doesn't conform to their leftwing options.

Some headlines to prove this:

CNN: YouTube waits until a month after the election to act on false claims of election fraud

Note the criticism in the headline is just about "waiting" to impose fascist thought control.

Forbes: YouTube To Finally Start Removing ‘Stolen Election’ Content Weeks After Election Day

"Finally." At long last-- fascism!

Daily Beast: YouTube Finally bans videos from election fraud cranks

"Finally" again.

And the subhead reads:


Yes, they sure took too much time in deciding to eliminate free speech rights from half the population of the country.

The media is always the driver of censorship. It is always CNN demanding that Twitter and YouTube and FaceBook censor this content or deplatform this commentator, and they keep running hostile, negative stories until the social media monpolies comply.

Although I think this is achieved by collusion: the social media companies want to censor, but they need their leftwing media facists to "make the case" for attacking free speech before they do so.

Democrats have been very aggressive in demanding that the social media monopolies strip citizens of their right to free speech.

For example, from Endgaget:

Senate Democrats call on YouTube to pull videos with election lies

Four senators sent a letter to YouTube expressing 'deep concern' over misinformation

YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki received a letter on Tuesday from four Democratic senators expressing "deep concern" over the spread of election misinformation on Google's video platform. In the letter, senators Robert Menendez of New Jersey, Mazie Hirono of Hawaii, Gary Peters of Michigan and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota ask YouTube to commit to removing content with false or misleading information about the 2020 US presidential election and future political races, including the coming, pivotal Senate runoffs in Georgia.

"We urge you to immediately remove all election outcome misinformation and take aggressive steps to implement prohibitions, as other social media companies have done, regarding outcomes in future elections," the letter reads.

That report is from November 24th. And now, with the Media-Democrat Complex demanding authoritarian speech controls and "making the case" for censorship, YouTube complies.

As they always do.

Can't wait for the Corporate-Owned Libertarians to explain to me that free speech is not a right and if I don't like it, I should just "make my own internet."

And I should, obviously, also make my own credit-card payment services, too, because those companies have begun banning anyone whose speech they don't like.

So no one can earn money from speech -- unless it's the right kind of speech that the ruling class technofascist junta finds agreeable.

Speech is a luxury only for the independently wealthy.

Tell me, how many gigantic megacorporations do I need to found for myself before I am allowed to speak freely?

digg this
posted by Ace at 01:34 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Rodrigo Borgia: "> 11 " There are never any real cuts. Ever." Spot ..."

Indignacio Vindacatorem: "Though much is taken, much abides; and though we a ..."

CharlieBrown'sDildo: "when I click the link I get a 404 error. Could a C ..."

Skip : "Good morning JJ and horde ..."

Lost In Space: "Kevin gave an academy award performance as the lea ..."

Rodrigo Borgia: "Tranheiser Busch has reportedly signed a deal with ..."

Thomas Bender: ">>Good morning, kids. So congratulations, I guess ..."

Martini Farmer: "Failure theater defines winning as losing with dig ..."

Aetius451AD Work Laptop: "Wait, this is going to be a full service holiday? ..."

Check Out gp's Rehoboth Beach Tan!: ""My X 'upgraded' their Z software and now it's fvc ..."

sidney: "" There are never any real cuts. Ever." Spot on, ..."

Hadrian the Seventh: " [i]The "St. Gaudens" in Boston Common (Col. Shaw ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64