Candace Owens Says That No Society Can Exist Without "Manly Men," But Then Immediately Gets Attacked by Two of the Most Masculine Men in Political Media: David French and Jay Nordlinger

Gee, could it be that these two paragons of manhood are upset by a woman praising manly men?

By the way: Look at what Candace Owens was criticizing when she made this statement.

But the Ambiguously Gay Duo just couldn't let her insult to their (shriveled) manhoods stand.

David French, who has previously expressed his support of gender-fluidity by praising transgender storytime hour at public libraries for very young children as a Blessing of Liberty (TM) , rushed to attack her:

This mincing little bitch actually tweeted this out within hours of calling Trump a "boy-child:" More childish squeeing for a SuperFriends recut movie.

Jay Nordlinger took a moment from yapping endlessly about fashion and Broadway to stick up for non-traditionally-masculine men:

This is from this effeminate twat's breezy simperings:

I would like to bring up kind of an offbeat one: manliness, or manhood. A solid understanding of manliness. In recent years, people on the right have had some screwy ideas of manliness, equating it with belligerence and vulgarity.

It's amazing how quickly political discussion can get sexualized. Express disapproval of Donald Trump and Trumpism, and you'll get "Grow a pair!" etc. Many of us can testify on this score.

I said earlier this year that right-wing politics can seem an endless round of "Quien es más macho?" (Who is more macho?) This was a sketch that Saturday Night Live had, eons ago.

At the dawn of the Trump administration, a leading personality on the right said, "The alpha males are back." Other people are called “beta.” Donald Trump is a real man, you see -- an "alpha." John McCain, Mitt Romney, and others are girly men, or "betas."

What makes you beta, apart from genetics and your yearning to be held by Big Strong Arms, is your craven craving of approval from your peers.

It's disgusting to watch "men" compete for Social Validation Points like eighth grade girls.

And that's what they mean by "Grow a pair," you ridiculous pansy. They mean, "Have the courage to stand alone without soliciting the approval of your leftist peer group."

But you never will.

No one at National Review ever will.

National Review's NeverTrumpers all pat themselves on the back for daring to betray their former conservative allies.

They endlessly praise themselves for having the courage to betray conservatives.

But the thing is: Conservatives are a minority, and in fact a despised minority.

It takes no bravery at all to slander and spit upon a despised minority.

And the National Review NeverTrump Warriors never, ever admit that while they might get some blowback on FUCKING TWITTER for "daring" to attack ctual conservatives, they just happen to be cozying up to the hegemonic leftwing media hugbox.

Which is such an overwhelming majority in their peergroups as to be the only group whose favor is worthy currying.

They never mention that -- that by betraying conservatives, they're gaining the favor of the many, many thousands of media liberals and corporate progressives.

But they'll just keep patting themselves on the back for spiting minor Twitter users who, notably, cannot give them jobs.

posted by Ace at 03:49 PM

| Access Comments