After New York Times Threatens to Reveal Tucker Carlson's New Address -- Having Been Forced to Move By Antifa After His Previous Address Was Published -- Someone Doxxes the NYT Reporter Threatening to Dox Carlson

Wait, the New York Times had claimed its own doxxing was just some fine journalisming.

Is it not journ0lisming when a New York Times' reporter's home address is publicized?

Video of Tucker Carlson announcing that the Times is doing target spotting for antifa terrorists, below.

In response, allegedly one of Tucker Carlson's "fans" published the address of the doxxing reporter.

What's the objection here?

On Monday night, Fox News host Tucker Carlson made a surprising accusation: the New York Times, he said, was trying to endanger him and his family by revealing where they live in an upcoming story. As he lambasted the newspaper on-air, Carlson suggested that his prime-time show could expose the home addresses of the reporter and Times editors.

Within hours, an army of conservative Twitter accounts started publicly posting the address and personal information of the reporter Carlson identified as the story's writer. Many encouraged people to harass the reporter.

The NYT was playing target-spotter for antifa. They should be harassed.

The Times now denies it was going to dox Carlson:

"While we do not confirm what may or may not publish in future editions, the Times has not and does not plan to expose any residence of Tucker Carlson's, which Carlson was aware of before tonight's broadcast," the spokesperson said. The spokesperson declined to comment further when asked about the reporter's doxing.

Weird that Carlson called you and you forgot to tell him that, but instead intimidated you might/would publish his address.

Yup:

Agreed:

posted by Ace at 12:09 PM

| Access Comments