Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info

Supreme Court Backs Trump on Using Pentagon Funds to Build Border Wall | Main | Wholesome ONT
July 26, 2019

I Guess, For a Start...

Here's a question:

Why are the Senate Republicans not calling Hillary Clinton to testify, under oath, about her knowledge regarding the payments she was making through cut-outs to Russian intelligence operatives for political dirt?

And more importantly: Why are we not asking that? Why has no one proposed that?

Here's my answer. And I think this is true -- and chilling.

Because we're conditioned to understand, in our very bones, that we're not allowed to ask that.

That we're not permitted to even think that.

Demanding Hillary Clinton testify about her own payments to Russians seems obvious. She paid Russians for dirt, which I'm assured is treason.

Why are we not taking the simple, obvious step of questioning her about her treason?

But no one -- and I do mean no one -- even suggests it because of the terroristic left and the constant barrage of media criticism and attacks has put us into a state of constant self-censorship which has evolved into actual, genuine doublethink.

It's not that we think of this and then dismiss it as impossible.

We don't even allow ourselves to think it in the first place.

That's doublethink -- that's the goal of the Inner Party. To make it impossible to even think a thought that the Inner Party disapproves of.

They're not doing 90% of the censorship. Oh, they're doing 10% of it, and it's a big 10%.

But 90% of it they're making us do ourselves.

They've made us so conscious of their demands, and so fearful of their response for not fulfilling those demands, that it has become an autonomous nervous response for our brains to avoid even thinking things that would displease our masters.

They say that if you leave a leash on a dog for five years, even when you take the leash off, he'll remain in the perimeter the now-missing leash would have permitted him.

That's where we are. Unable to even make ourselves venture outside the small little circle our Masters have permitted us.

Doublethink. We know that Good Conservatives -- Conservatives who do not get attacked and doxxed and harassed by partisan government officials -- simply do not ask things like "Why isn't Hillary Clinton, the ultimate paymaster who paid Russians for dirt to attempt a soft coup, being asked questions under oath?"

Even thinking that immediately causes our superegos to step in and shut that thought down: That's not proper! That's not who we are!


They'll make you PAY for thoughts like that.

That's pretty much the entire real dispute between real conservatives and NeverTrump -- NeverTrump are the enforcers of the left's doublethink rules and the ones shrieking at us that doublethink rules are good and wise, because otherwise, we'll devolve into the monsters everyone knows that we are.

They want to be Good Little Boys and nice little dogs that don't go outside the range of the leash Master was kind enough to tie around their throats.

I don't.

Maybe it's time to start thinking some unthinkable thoughts, just to prove we're even capable of it any longer.


Mr. Dalrymple: "In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control."

Self-censorship is the best censorship!

Posted by: The Gipper Speaks

digg this
posted by Ace of Spades at 08:16 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b]: "[i]Texas Toast French Toast Where ya get water ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b]: "[i] At least he's not installing a stool softener ..."

JT: "Texas Toast French Toast Where ya get water fro ..."

JQ: "From what I gather the Israeli strike was not inte ..."

San Franpsycho: "Here's an important question. Challah French To ..."

JT: "1 Why is French Toast called French Toast ? Pos ..."

Ciampino - whose toast?: "31 Why is French Toast called French Toast ? Po ..."

San Franpsycho: "At least he's not installing a stool softener ! P ..."

San Franpsycho: "From what I gather the Israeli strike was not inte ..."

Bruce: "At least he's not installing a stool softener ! P ..."

JT: "At least he's not installing a stool softener ! ..."

Bruce: "Coffee is ready. The plumber is coming today to in ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64