Ace: aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
Litigious Canadian Tranny Puts Another Salon Out of Business By Demanding the Female Workers Give Him a Brazilian On His Penis; He Claims He's a Woman Being Discriminated Against and Files a Complaint with Canada's Tranny Supremacy Committee
We’ve moved on from “Bake my cake!” to “Wax my balls!”
This man in a Party City wig has previously gotten other women -- many of them immigrants -- to shut down their salons for the crime of refusing to touch a mentally insane man's pud.
A born male who identifies as female, and whose male genitalia is still intact, is suing female-only waxers on the basis that their refusal to wax his bollocks -- sorry, her bollocks -- is an act of discrimination. Yes, this person believes that because he identifies as female he should therefore have access to every female service, including the most intimate female services. Any female beautician who refuses to tend to his testicles is being 'transphobic,' apparently, because they are denying his womanhood. Even though he has a penis. And testicles. And is a man. That’s hate speech, I know.
This is the case of Jessica Yaniv, born Jonathan Yaniv, who has filed complaints against more than a dozen female waxers with the Human Rights Council (HRC) in British Columbia. Yaniv claims that the women’s refusal to give him a Brazilian-- that is, to handle his penis and testicles and to remove his pubic hair, activities these women did not want to carry out -- is discrimination. Yaniv says that self-identifying as a woman is sufficient to be treated as a woman and to get access to services typically reserved for women. In the words of the National Post, the HRC hearings revolve around the question, 'Should a business be allowed to deny service on the basis of gender identity?' Or perhaps, 'Should a woman be forced by law to touch a penis she doesn’t want to touch?' -- that's a franker, more honest way of putting it, though it's obvious why people don’t put it like that, given it would expose the fundamental misogyny at play in this demented case.
...
You can now be a bigot simply for believing in reality itself, in this case that people with penises are not women. Pressuring women to handle male genitalia against their will is dreadful and it suggests woke politics has now crossed the line from irritating to disgusting.
Remember last week I mentioned that Lindsey Sheppherd had been permanently banned for responding to a nasty tranny troll's insults?
Sheppherd said of that tranny that the initials were "J.Y."
The tranny in this case has the initials J.Y.
Sheppherd said that tranny had a history of weird obsession with ten-year-old girls' menstruation and their tampons.
This may be wild speculation on my part, but I'm going to guess the litigious crazyman who insists his dick is really his vagina is the same guy who got Lindsey Sheppherd banned for responding to his taunts about her (real) vagina.