Former SNL Cast Member Chris Kattan Says Lorne Michaels Pressured Him to Have Sex with Producer of SNL Movie "A Night At the Roxbury"

Actually, Amy Heckerling was attached to the garbage project as director at the time. She'd later become producer.

Honestly, this is barely an allegation.

"Saturday Night Live" alum Chris Kattan claims in a new book that producer Lorne Michaels once pressured him to have sex with a director so she would stay attached to the 1990s comedy film "A Night At The Roxbury."

In his memoir, "Baby, Don’t Hurt Me," Kattan said director Amy Heckerling was slated to helm the 1998 movie when she came onto him. Kattan, then 27, writes that he rebuffed the 43-year-old "Clueless" director’s advances.

The next day, he says he got a call from a "furious" Michaels, who allegedly told him Heckerling was considering backing out of the project.

Michaels allegedly told him that "Paramount would only do the movie if Amy signed on as a director, not as a producer," and if he "wanted to make sure the movie happened, then [he] had to keep Amy happy."

"Chris, I’m not saying you have to f–k her, but it wouldn’t hurt," Michaels allegedly said.

...

Kattan alleged that ultimately he and Heckerling had a consensual sexual encounter on the couch in her office.

A spokesman for SNL denies the story.

Like I said, I don't even know if this is a story. It's just embarrassing for Amy Heckerling, who's blameless in this except for having really bad taste in manlets, and Kattan is a bitch for dragging her into this.

Here's a weird thing I just thought of: I was wondering "Why would anyone be so hot for Chris Kattan" but then I remembered that he used to date Zooey Deschanel, the It girl of the 2000s, before people really knew who she was.

But she was still Zooey Deschanel, super-cute.

I used to think that was a fake arranged Gay Beard "relationship" but apparently he's not gay. So I guess that actually happened.

How?

Why?

Meanwhile, #MeToo evangelist and feminist yapper Patricia Arquette is complaining that a tv network expects you to be slim and looking younger than you actually are if you want to star as the hero of tv show.

She told the Hollywood Reporter: "I had an argument with one of the producers on 'Medium,' who told me I should lose weight. I was like, 'This lady is a mother, she's married, she’s got three kids. No.' But there's that expectation ... of looking a certain way. Like, 'OK, you could be 40, but you've got to be a 40 who looks 30.'"

Oh my God, you poor dear, evil Men paid you several millions of dollars a year to stay low-carb and hit the gym three days a week, something millions and millions of people do even though they're not paid millions to do it...

Um, Patricia? If people aren't hiring you based on looks, why shouldn't they hire an actress who's less attractive but a better actress?

Patricia Arquette was an okay actress, but let's be real, she became a thing because she had a rocking body. But she objects to keeping her key asset in marketable condition.

And by the way, male actors have to lose weight for roles, too. Hugh Jackman says he doesn't want to play Wolverine any more due to the demands it places on his aging frame to stay jacked and ripped all the time; other actors complain of this as well.

About fifteen years ago, I was out at dinner, and seated at the next table were Aiden Quinn, Steve Buscemi, and Stanley Tucci. (For weeks afterwards, I bragged that I had had dinner with "two celebrities and Stanley Tucci.")

Anyway, Aiden Quinn was pretty fat. Not like obese, but certainly fat for a Hollywood actor. Notceably heavy.

Yet he was always slim in movies he did in that era. I wonder how he accomplished this... Gee, maybe he would diet and get into shape for movies?

But it's just a real shock to rich privileged feminists hired for their looks that they're supposed to maintain their looks.

It's just life. But for rich privileged feminists, it's just more seeds for Grievance Farming.

posted by Ace of Spades at 01:08 PM

| Access Comments