Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Trump: We're Reopening the Government for Three Weeks; If After Three Weeks There Is No Deal for a Wall, The Government Will Either Shutdown Again or I Will Use Emergency Powers to Order The Wall Built | Main | only lulz can reunite this splintered caucus
January 25, 2019

So Here's the Actual Situation

1. Trump and Republicans are losing support, not gaining it.

This means that the current tactic is not moving the Overton Window in the right direction. It's moving it in the left direction.

Nancy Pelosi is winning the shutdown as it's currently occurring. Why would she back down or negotiate when her best play is to just keep on doing what she's doing?

This is like a football team running the ball every play and getting stuffed for a half yard loss every play. And then one coach says "Maybe we could mix things up with a pass or trick play" and other coaches say, "That's for The Gayz. Let's keep running to show we're not afraid to run."

Okay, we could do that.

But what are we hoping to accomplish there, beyond demonstrating our capacity for masochism and willingness to eat political failure in order to crap policy failure?

What is the actual upside of "keep on doing what we're doing?" Someone please explain this to me. We're losing. Keeping doing what we're doing means more losing.

I feel like there's some underpants gnome logic going on here:

1, do the same thing which is not working

2, ???

3, profit politically, win the wall

I need to know what "2" is there.

2, Trump needs a change in dynamic if he wants to come out of this with anything because his current trajectory is We're losing so much you're gonna get sick of losing.

To use another sports metaphor: In basketball, when the other team is on a 12-2 run, you call a timeout. You try to disrupt their timing, their flow. You try to develop a new plan and make personnel adjustments.

You don't just sit there doing the same thing letting a 12-2 run turn into a 26-8 run.

Is this temporary time-out enough to change things? Almost certainly not!

But it's better than doing what we're doing, which is failing.

3. Shutdowns never work for either party.

If anyone can name a government shutdown in which the party shutting it down actually won the political issue they were seeking, please name it.

The Democrats even lost their shutdown, with all the Media Privilege they have! Not even the combined might of the Democrat Media Complex can win a shutdown.

These things always fail. This was a failure from the beginning. Not a single shutdown has ever succeeded; why would this one succeed? This was about proving to the base "we mean it," even though we don't mean it.

4. This was already all lost when Trump couldn't get a Republican controlled Congress to appropriate funds to build the wall.

How's he gonna get Democrats to do what Republicans refused to do?

First, he didn't press the issue. That's on him. He's lazy and easily distracted. He has energy. He does not have focus or follow-through.

Second, Failure Theater Director Mitch McConnell permitted a "filibuster" in the Senate to kill wall funding, which is what Mitch McConnell wanted.

This is failure theater. As Derek Hunter explained (or reminded) in a Daily Caller podcast just before Christmas, the Senate rules actually require a talking, real filibuster for a filibuster to actually stop a bill. That means that everyone has exactly two (2) times to talk, and they can talk as long as they want, but they must talk, and they cannot take breaks. That would end their speaking slot.

When all speakers who want to speak have spoken twice -- that's it, filibuster is over. Cloture now happens by majority vote and we proceed to a vote on the actual substance of the matter.

McConnell knows damn well this is the rule for filibusters but he's made a gentlemen's agreement with non-gentlemen that they will pretend they've done a real filibuster if they merely refuse to vote for cloture.

McConnell doesn't want to force a real filibuster for several reasons.

1, he doesn't want the wall. He's not being paid by corporate interests to reduce the flow of low-skilled labor into the country.

2, he is stupid enough to think that Chuck Schumer will honor his side of the gentleman's agreement and permit this Lazy Filibuster when Republicans are in the minority.

3, he's super lazy and old and doesn't want to have to stand on his feet for hours and hours talking. That's hard. It's also a test of endurance that favors younger men, and these old, weak men of the Senate do not want to put themselves through that and do not want to be seen failing at that -- if an old senator fails to stand his post, that invites a primary challenge from a younger, more robust man.

Imagine if there were a real filibuster on one of the Obamacare votes and some old GOP senators like Thad Cochran were exposed as huge liabilities that broke the filibuster and allowed Obamacare to pass. He'd've been out next cycle.

These old men don't want to play young men's games.

They want to serve forever and they don't want to work very hard. So they're going to go with the Old Man Filibuster until Schumer (or Harris, or Booker) gets into power and decides it's worth scrapping.

So we failed the moment the Congress changed from R to D. Since then we've just been playing at theater, stagecraft, and battlespace preparation.

The only real part of this is Trump making the case that he can/must use his emergency powers.

Everything else is just pure kabuki.

And finally:

5. Trump can't back down or he will not be reelected. But on the other hand, Nancy Pelosi can't back down or she'll lose her majority.

So this is pointless. Both sides know this.

The only thing that's going to resolve this issue is Trump declaring a national emergency and building a wall using his inherent and statutory powers.

The only useful part of the shutdown, and it's barely useful, is making a case to a Hawaiian judge that Congress is dysfunctional and cannot act in the face of an actual emergency and therefore Trump's has plausible justification to declare an emergency within the meaning of the statutes.

digg this
posted by Ace of Spades at 03:06 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
The Button Down Mind: "Bob Newhart is, was, and forevermore shall be, the ..."

80's music fan: "Tell us you have never met a democrat without tell ..."

LinusVanPelt : "Joe Biden: Is it live or is it memorex?? ..."

BruceWayne: "I love ya kid. Things Joe has never said to Kamala ..."

TheJamesMadison, riding the anarchy train with John Landis: "454 Boy the "chaotic" "out of control" Democrat pa ..."

no one of any consequence: "Last time I checked, and it was about 40 years ago ..."

...: "Over under on when we see the first Che style Kama ..."

Minnfidel: "I love ya kid. Things Joe has never said to Kamala ..."

runner: "BREAKING 🚨 The Whitehouse Gets Caught Usin ..."

SMOD: "First Lady Paris-Bound for Olympics to Lead Americ ..."

Warai-otoko : "Endorse is one of those words that loses its meani ..."

...: "Boy the "chaotic" "out of control" Democrat party ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64