« Trump White House Revokes Jim Acosta's WH Pass, Denying Him Entry on to the Grounds |
Main
|
Wednesday Overnight Open Thread (11/7/18 ) »
November 07, 2018
Shocker: The Cucks Come Out to Defend Acosta
I don't usually link Paul Joseph Watson but he is 100% correct here.
I mean, at what point do people admit to themselves that Ben Shapiro is more interested in promoting his Donor Supported Career and drinking conservative tears than advancing any kind of conservative agenda?
Don't believe your own eyes -- believe Not-Binary Ben Shapiro.
Ben Shapiro wouldn't lie to you. Except for minor things like who he supported in the 2016 election and why he's pretending he's now open to voting for Trump.
Spoiler Alert: He's trying to launch a radio show and knows full well he won't get anywhere with his NeverTrump persona. So now he's pretending he's a "Sometimes Trump."
After supporting Hillary Clinton in 2016 and lying about it, you can now believe Not-Binary Ben that he's "open" to maybe supporting a conservative candidate over a progressive Democrat.
Did you really think Not-Binary Ben had some reason for his bizarre pirrouhettes besides self-interest and mercenary careerism?
More fool, you.
So go on, keep giving him (and his megabuck donors) clicks, and keep buying his #OwnTheLibs merch, in between listening to him piously scold you that you must not #OwnTheLibs.
Only he can. He's a professional Lib-Owner. Licensed and everything. (Note: that license might be paid for by the professional liberal/Establishment semi-Republican donor class.)
Not-Binary Ben Might Have Cucked His Last Cucking: It's a full-on revolt against this yapping chihuahua of a fascist grifter.
A Little Background: I personally know a former CNN contributor who was told by Jake Tapper, He Who Makes Wives of Weak, Effeminate Men, that this person was "burning bridges" by frequently criticizing CNN (or the media in general, which implicitly includes CNN, given its among the worst offenders).
The suggestion seemed to be -- and it was just a suggestion; it wasn't explicit -- was that this person would have more frequent CNN appearances if the media criticism were more tempered and more... rare.
So when you see people lining up to defend CNN and you're wondering, "Why would they do that?," remember, you might just get told you're "burning bridges" with CNN if you don't toe their preferred corporate line.
And remember, some of these people don't really have such a bright future in conservative media any longer.
Hmmm... I can't figure out who is the real conservative here -- Not-Binary Ben or Kurt Schlichter?
posted by Ace of Spades at
09:38 PM
|
Access Comments