The New York Times Was Preparing Yet Another Hit-Piece on Kavanaugh, This Time Alleging That He Was Responsible for Organizing a Beach Week Party, But Mollie Hemingway Scoops Them and Delivers All the Scarifying Details

Ooops, New York Times. Guess you're not as indispensable as you think.

Having failed to corroborate any allegations of rape against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, The New York Times is now preparing to smear him for organizing party planning and logistics more than 30 years ago. This comes on the heels of a blockbuster Times report alleging that Kavanaugh might have thrown ice at someone at some point in the 1980s.

The Times is calling around to classmates asking them about a letter Kavanaugh allegedly wrote to a classmate to organize a week at the beach during the 1980s, according to multiple sources.

What a monster.

The letter notes the location on the Maryland shore where the classmates planned to stay, the estimated costs for each organizer, and items they should bring with them, such as "sheets, pillowcases, blankets, etc."

"Sheets," etc. are codewords for "Ku Klux Klan garb and lynchin' ropes."

The letter noted that a total of eight friends, including Kavanaugh, were "in charge" and that they would each get to have beds to sleep in at the designated rental property and a say in who else was invited.

"In charge" = assuming a sexually dominant role, coordinating Intimidation Scenarios and Humiliation Play

"Beds" = "rape racks"

The tongue-in-cheek note, infused with inside jokes, said they should talk to neighbors of the property ahead of time and give them a heads up that a party would be hosted there and that alcohol and obnoxious students would be involved.

Tongue? Inside?

I've never seen perversions of this sort.

...

The letter also made note of their awkwardness with girls, whom the teenage boys very much hoped would join them at the party.

"I think we are unanimous that any girls we can beg to stay there are welcomed with open..." he wrote.

Boys showing a normal healthy sexual interest in girls without showing shame about it?!

What is this, Five Years Ago?!

The New York Times is now lying that they have an "exclusive" on this note -- despite the fact that The Federalist had it hours ago.

They're now just lying remorselessly about the remorseless lies they publish.

Oh, and check out the Senate Judiciary Committee's pointed response to Creepy Porn Lawyer's demand that they pay more attention to his crowd-surfing client.

Bonus:

posted by Ace of Spades at 07:49 PM

| Access Comments