Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cucks: Well We Failed In Our Goal of Helping the Democrats Beat You. Now That You've Won, We Urge You to Surrender.
The tactic they all seem to have agreed upon, probably furiously scheming in their listservs, is to propose the "modest" compromise of, get this, further delay to allow the Democrats to recruit more accusers.
I’m for a week’s delay for more inquiries, by the Committee &/or FBI, along the lines suggested by the ABA, @DouthatNYT & @asymmetricinfo. The swing senators could request this—but their leverage would have to be a commitment to vote No if forced to cast an up or down vote now.
If I had to vote today, I think I’d be a No. This may be unfair to Kavanaugh; and it sets a bad precedent re unverified allegations. But given where we are, wouldn’t a future Court with a different constitutionalist justice be healthier for the nation—and for constitutionalism?
I’ll repeat: A relatively modest & seemingly achievable idea is to assign two FBI agents to speak with Mark Judge within the next 24/48 hours, ask some questions, take his statement, and enter it into the record. 1/