I’m for a week’s delay for more inquiries, by the Committee &/or FBI, along the lines suggested by the ABA, @DouthatNYT & @asymmetricinfo. The swing senators could request this—but their leverage would have to be a commitment to vote No if forced to cast an up or down vote now.

— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) September 28, 2018

If I had to vote today, I think I’d be a No. This may be unfair to Kavanaugh; and it sets a bad precedent re unverified allegations. But given where we are, wouldn’t a future Court with a different constitutionalist justice be healthier for the nation—and for constitutionalism?

— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) September 28, 2018

Maybe the strongest possible argument for R's pumping the brakes and going into close-door session to investigate some more. https://t.co/yRwU081JqX

— Jonathan V. Last (@JVLast) September 28, 2018

Surely Judge, Garrett and Leland Keyser could be interviewed privately by Senate investigators between today and the final vote.

— Ross Douthat (@DouthatNYT) September 28, 2018

I’ll repeat: A relatively modest & seemingly achievable idea is to assign two FBI agents to speak with Mark Judge within the next 24/48 hours, ask some questions, take his statement, and enter it into the record. 1/

— Guy Benson (@guypbenson) September 28, 2018

I told you.

🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳 https://t.co/wGyIeVpyKF

— Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) September 28, 2018

🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳

Conservative Inc. is a grift for lesser sons of greater fathers to achieve unearned position.

Remember how they deserted when it mattered.

Or, rather, leapt overboard.

Ahoy.@LarryOConnor @ChrisStigall @Uncle_Jimbo

🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳🛳 https://t.co/Rpd5ma1Pei

— Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) September 28, 2018

Ever woman's nightmare is slowly drowning while your fellow Kennedy seeks out his fixer to cover it all up. https://t.co/idwvEzQ0Gf

— Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) September 28, 2018