Media Intensely Interested in Right-Wing (Allegedly) Anti-Semite That Draws Crowds of Less Than 50;
But Not At All Interested in Left-Wing Anti-Semite Louis Farakhan Who Draws Crowds of 10,000, and Has High-Profile Democrats Like Barack Obama Courting

From Steven Green at PJ Media's Hot Mic...

Sexton has a piece up of one of the Women's March founders claiming she attended the event only because it's her practice to enter "difficult spaces."

That is, she didn't want to pay tribute to a virulent anti-semite; she bravely went forth to confront the evil.

That is, how to best put it?, a stupid lie. Sexton writes:

Let's start with the idea that Mallory attended the Savior's Day event because she goes "into difficult spaces." This is a complete rewriting of very recent history. She didn’t go to that event because it was difficult (but necessary). As she admits, she has been attending this event her entire life. She enjoys it and finds comfort in it.

Far from confronting Farrakhan, she celebrated him:

Mallory attended and posted selfies from the event which made it look like she was having a great time. She got a shout-out from Farrakhan himself. She was honored by him, just as she has honored him previously. Last year she posted a smiling photo with Farrakhan calling him the GOAT, i.e. the greatest of all time. And when Farrakhan was criticized after the event, she defended him by claiming he had the same enemies as Jesus (i.e. the Jews).

All of this is justified by the claim made by the New Racists: That no member of an "oppressed group," especially blacks, can be racist, or anti-semitic. What would be racism or anti-semitism from anyone with lighter-colored skin is just the brave struggle against oppressors and colonizers when indulged by a black person.

Indeed, they've had to invent a new word to describe skin-color-based-discrimination by blacks or hispanics against other blacks or hispanics. They can't call this what every sane person would call it -- "racism" -- because, as a fundamental semantic truth, they've decreed that blacks and hispanics cannot be racist, even when being super-racist.

So they've created a new word for discriminating based on skin color or race by people who are black or hispanic: "colorist." See, they can't be racists; only white people can be racists.

So the people discriminating on basis of race or skin-color are merely "colorists," which isn't good, but definitely isn't racism either, because that's a sin only the White Devil can commit.

Oh, and by the way: Farrakhan says the Jews use the FBI to oppress the blacks.

Racism against Jews? Nah, black people can't be racists. At worst it's just a bit of colorism expressed against slightly-olive-skinned Jews, and, given that most Jews are just white, that means it's not racist or even colorist at all.

For years people have tolerated this central lie of Black Racism, that blacks cannot be racism, for fear of giving offense and out of, frankly, racial condescension.

It's high time this central lie justifying racist hate was confronted and called a lie, as it is, and the people trafficking in racism were called racists, which they are.

Here's a couple of Pro-Tips, Racists:

If you're explaining that your Race gives you innate privileges and social license that those of dirtier races do not share, congratulations! You're a racists. Racists say that.

If you're explaining the racial hate that pours out of your mouth is justified because the races you hate really are Gutter Races created by The Devil and deserving of hatred, congratulations! You're a racist. Racists say that too.

posted by Ace at 03:26 PM

| Access Comments