Some Media and Dem Spinners Attempt to Downplay FusionGPS Dossier/DNC/HRC Connection, Claiming "We Already Knew That," But Reporters Complain That They Were Repeatedly Lied to When They Asked About It

Here's ABC "News'" Political Director saying "No biggie:"

Here's CNN's Retard Apple Boy agreeing:

As Instapundit asked: If it's no big deal, why did they lie about it for a year?

Hillary shill Brian Fallon tried to claim that flat-out lying was just being "coy:"

Haberman responded directly to that false characterization:

Even Iran Echo Chamber Female Chorus Lead Laura Rozen agreed that a "no comment" is being coy, but lying is lying.

JE Dyer of Liberty Unyielding writes about all the loathesome lies and why this was leaked now.

By the way, also check out flailing little twat Brian Fallon's second attempt at spin:

What he's saying is that Steele faced (minor, exaggerated, not terribly serious) danger composing the bullshit dossier, and for some reason, it was necessary for Marc Elias to lie to reporters about whether stateside pencil-pushers and chairborne rangers did an oppo business deal together. To protect Steele or something.

How the hell would acknowledging that they paid for the dossier put Steele in danger? Elias dealt with FusionGPS. These are all jobs with offices and air conditioning and fat guys eating pies. They're not in any danger, and "outing" them doesn't out Steele.

Besides that, Steele's involvement has been known for six months and Elias has been lying up until ten minutes ago.

By the way, CNN, where apples are bananas and bananas are apples whenever their Democratic anonymous sources say so, asked Brian Fallon if his old (and current?) boss Hillary knew about the dossier. CNN expected him to say no, but Fallon said "maybe."

posted by Ace at 04:37 PM

| Access Comments