Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups






















« Saturday Afternoon Chess/Open Thread (Featuring Dress Pr0n) 07-29-2017 | Main | Overnight Open Thread (29 Jul 2017) »
July 29, 2017

Saturday Evening Movie Thread 07-29-2017 [Hosted By: TheJamesMadison]

Action!

action.jpg

A good action scene is why some of us get out of bed in the morning. We love to watch explosions, car chases, fist fights, and general mayhem on screen.

But, have you ever thought about how hard it is to make such a flurry of editing, sound, and movement intelligible to the human eye projected sixty feet high?

You might be surprised by this, but I have.

I’m no expert, but I think that action scenes need to follow two basic rules to reach a foundational level of comprehensible. Great action scenes generally do a whole lot more, but if these two aren’t met, then it gets a lot harder to figure out what’s going on.


“Never be muddy, never be boring”

craig as bond.jpg

That was a piece of advice one of my creative writing professors (he was British, like the man above) in college gave me, and it has stuck with me ever since. I think what he said about how to write fiction can apply to how to compose an action scene.

1) “Never be muddy” means that there should be clarity to what is being conveyed. You should be able to tell where people are (the geography of the scene) and to differentiate between them. If the editing of the scene leads you to believe that the antagonist on one side of the room and then he magically appears on the other to give the protagonist a punch in the face, then the audience gets pulled out of the moment. “He wasn’t there,” they say to themselves as they demand some semblance of rules from the scene.

This also extends to just visual differentiation as well. I’m going to talk more about Kill Bill: Volume 1 in a little bit, but I think how Tarantino dressed our protagonist and her opponents helps make the scene so much clearer than it could have been. She’s dressed all in yellow while the drones she fights are all in black. It’s a contrast that pops off the screen and helps to keep us knowledgeable of where everyone is, along with a few other important factors like editing, staging, and lighting. Center framing (keeping all the action in the center of the frame) helps some more chaotic films like Mad Max: Fury Road remain legible amidst the anarchy.

2) “Never be boring” means that if you are going to have an action scene that lasts more than a few seconds, you can’t have the same thing repeated endlessly. Imagine two little boys with toy swords just parrying little blows back and forth without ever changing. That wouldn’t be terribly exciting, now would it. If you have a fist fight, it can’t just be two guys throwing little jabs, but you have at least mix it up with some other moves to keep things from growing stale.

One of the reasons that I’m a slight defender of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is the action sequences. The opening sequence in the warehouse is almost madcap in how the scene keeps changing the setups and executions to almost every blow. It starts as a Mexican standoff, turns into a car chase, then into a fist fight (including falling through a ceiling and the use of chains), continues with a horizontal rocket launch, and only finally ends with the nuclear explosion. I’ve always found that very fun, even if it’s completely unrealistic and borderline silly.


An Exception

batman begins.jpg

What would one of these be without me being a horrible hypocrite?

Well, let me show you the scene that I’m going to call an exception, first. It’s from Batman Begins and is the first appearance of The Batman in the film.

Especially when Batman fell down into the middle of the group of bad guys and started giving blows, that was muddy, wasn’t it? You won’t get any argument from me. It’s hard to tell what’s going on.

But that’s okay. “Why?” you ever so politely ask. Well, it has everything to do with something that’s very important to Christopher Nolan, point of view. Every scene he directs is told from a particular point of view, this one is no different. They key is in how the scene is filmed. This action adventure movie suddenly has the trappings of a horror film, and it’s all because the scene is told from the point of view of the bad guys. The bad guys have no idea what’s after them or what’s going on so when Batman drops from the ceiling and beats them all, it’s confusing for them. They can’t see what is kicking their asses, and, by extension, neither can we.

The point of the scene isn’t the action itself, but the experience the bad guys have in the face of this new terrifying crime fighter. Cops have been shown as complicit in their actions, and suddenly there’s a creature in the shadows that’s after them? The law was effectively on their side! What’s this?!


Where things can break down

skyfall action.jpg

I just want to drop in a quick example of a beautifully filmed action scene that leaves me very cold. Most people love Skyfall, and I do too. But the below action scene done in the dark so the two men are silhouetted in front of neon lights, ends up being just basically confusing to me.

Could you tell who was whom throughout? I couldn’t. I love the movie, but this action scene has always taken me out of the movie.

As a quick counterpoint, I want to highlight this “action scene” from Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country. In it, we get confused as to which Kirk is the real Kirk.

But, as you can tell, there’s a small narrative reason for it. It’s to create that very confusion. See? Another rule broken, but it’s fine because narrative ultimately comes first.


I’m gonna kill Bill

kill bill 1.jpg

Alright, now the real reason I wrote all of this, and the part that no one will end up reading because it’s so far down.

The Showdown at House of Blue Leaves is one of the greatest action sequences ever filmed. It’s also one of the first action sequences Quentin Tarantino ever filmed. Look back at the three movies he made before this, and the closest to an action sequence you’ll find is Steve Buscemi running down the street in Reservoir Dogs and Marcellus Wallace getting hit with the car in Pulp Fiction. Even if you classify those as action scenes, they’re nothing compared to this.

And you know what? It follows the two basic rules I outlined above. In addition to that, what amazed me most about the sequence is the fact that the action sequence itself, on its own, actually follows the basic story structure of exposition, rising action, climax, falling action, and resolution. The action scene itself tells a story.

Exposition begins with The Bride calling out O-ren Ishii and laying out the reasons for her presence. The rising action is the first few people The Bride faces against (culminating in the battle with the schoolgirl dressed Go Go). The climax is the beginning of hell breaking loose as the rest of the gang ( the Crazy 88 ) show up and that fight begins. Declining action happens as she thins out the heard and faces O-ren one on one. Resolution happens as The Bride limps away from the carnage.

Maybe it’s too long. Maybe it’s too gratuitous. Maybe it’s too self-indulgent. But you know what? I love every minute of it.


Movies of Today

Opening in Theaters:
The Emoji Movie
Atomic Blonde

Next in my Netflix Queue:
The Milky Way

Movies I Saw This Week:
Fear and Desire (Netflix Rating 2/5 | Quality Rating 1.5/4) Poster blurb: "Stanley Kubrick made a movie so bad that he tried to destroy every copy. Come and watch!" [Amazon Prime]
The VVitch (Netflix Rating 5/5 | Quality Rating 3.5/4) "A terrifying and unsettling look at the seductive power of evil." [Amazon Prime]
Byzantium (Netflix Rating 4/5 | Quality Rating 3/4) "An interesting, if a little disjointed, modern vampire movie." [Netflix Instant]
Phoenix (Netflix Rating 4/5 | Quality Rating 3/4) "Gets caught up in minutia, but ends quietly and quite powerfully." [Netflix Instant]
Love in the Afternoon (Netflix Rating 5/5 | Quality Rating 3.5/4) "Rohmer’s movies feel more like theater than film, but they do end up conveying a strong message and impact." [Netflix DVD]


Contact

Email any suggestions or questions to thejamesmadison.aos at symbol gmail dot com.

digg this
posted by OregonMuse at 07:21 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
I'm Gumby Damn It!: "A Dem Op. You can tell by the stoopid as fuck tran ..."

CTHillary, dead but dreaming: ""p-shop of Lorenz" Uh, what does she sell at he ..."

Sebastian Melmoth: "To the Media and anti-2A guys, BIRM, a "bullet" is ..."

MAGA_Ken: "Rich people screw over the common man so much I ..."

Turn 2: "My wife thought it interesting that the shooter kn ..."

Smell the Glove: "@33 Bulg , you are correct I forget about Miss Pro ..."

Taq, Rickrolled by Jesus: "My first thought for this guy was if it was jab re ..."

Fishbone: "[i] Learn to swim... Posted by: Tool at December ..."

TheJamesMadison, trying to figure out Joel Schumacher: "44 Nate Silver's comment is 100% accurate. Posted ..."

Common Tater: "Other than that though, how did the Investor Confe ..."

PJ: "Interesting, Sebastian. I could not figure out how ..."

scampydog: "Calcified Taylor Lorenz is really a disturbed mess ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64