« Julian Assange Claims That "Sources" Confirm The Hillary Clinton Email Investigation Will be Re-Opened "Later Next Week" |
Main
|
Adam Kredo/Free Beacon: Top Lawmaker Calls for Investigation into Comey, Obama Aides Including Ben Rhodes, for Intel Leaks »
July 11, 2017
Teen Vogue, In Article About Butt Stuff, Mentions that Prostate Stimulation Is a Thing That Either Men or Women Can Enjoy
Former (?) Social Justice Warrior Laci Greene pointed out that women do not have prostate glands, and noted that it was absurd for Teen Vogue to discuss the two different biological sexes as "those who have a prostate" and "those who don't have a prostate," instead of just saying "men" and "women." (It's also pretty outrageous that Teen Vogue is selling anal sex to children, but I guess that ship has sailed.)
Last week, Teen Vogue published a visually explicit and kinda gross article about a certain sex act, which included diagrams of the female and male reproductive anatomy. The diagrams described female anatomy as the anatomy of a “non-prostate owner,” and described male anatomy as that which belongs to a “prostate owner” so as to avoid using the terms “male” and “female.”
So anyway now there's a Social Justice Jihad against her for noting that boys have boy parts and girls have girl parts -- at least as a biological matter. (She still buys into the notion that gender, distinguished from sex, can be fluid and self-willed.)
Meanwhile, the military continues considering whether to open enlistment to transgenders -- who will, under the proposed policy, be able to change their "gender marker" in official records without even going through the hassle of surgical "therapy" -- and I guess women will sooon be showering with biological men, with penises and prostates and the whole kit and kaboodle.
See the penis-in-women's-shower-rooms recommendation spelled out here.
Oh, and as this is The Post For Talking About Which Dirty Parts Men and Women Have, enjoy this abstract of a scholarly paper.
It's about the way we discuss the phallus in terms of power -- "having balls," for example -- and how that is "injurious" to lesbians who must suffer without the phallus. (Lesbians only? Aren't straight women also "injured" by phallic metaphors?)
The writer seems to call for a new vernacular in which we refer to the "powerful engorged clitoris" or something in order to reduce this painful injury.