« Open Thread |
Main
|
Dear GOP: Calling your own base a bunch of stupid hicks seems like a bad idea »
January 26, 2016
How A Spy Would Transfer Intelligence from the Secure to Non-Secure Networks to More Easily Allow Foreign Access
Kurt Schlichter speaks of a "minion" doing this, but let's just say a spy.
Who else deliberately exposes the most sensitive information to foreign intelligence?
Meanwhile, video has surfaced of a State aide bragging about all this "sharing of information" in real time, via email -- and a look-see at the stuff being sent at the time suggests it was classified information, all being sent, illegally, to Hillary Clinton's unsecure private (easily hackable) system.
n the video, veteran diplomat Wendy Sherman reveals that in the interest of speed, Clinton and her aides would share information that "would never be on an unclassified system" normally.
The questions surround a 2013 speech in which Sherman compared the technology differences between serving at the State Department in the administrations of President Bill Clinton and President Obama.
"Now we have BlackBerrys, and it has changed the way diplomacy is done," Sherman, who was undersecretary of state at the time, said in the 2013 on-camera remarks. "Things appear on your BlackBerrys that would never be on an unclassified system. But you're out traveling, you're trying to negotiate something. You want to communicate with people, it's the fastest way to do it."
...
Previous email releases by the State Department of Clinton's official correspondence show that in September 2011, Clinton aide Jake Sullivan forwarded her an email chain on the Quartet statement.
The State Department considered the correspondence sensitive enough that the department deemed some of those emails to now be classified, and officials redacted details before the emails were released to the public.