Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« Aaron Hernandez Convicted of Murder; Sentenced to the New York Jets | Main | New GOP Congress Pretty Much Like The Old Democrat One When It Comes To Spending »
April 15, 2015

Can Conservatives Unite Around One Candidate?


But it looks like some want to try.

A secretive group that serves as the umbrella operation for leaders and activists within the conservative movement will host two meetings in the coming months, National Journal has learned, the first to vet Republican presidential candidates and the second to discuss coalescing behind one of them.

The Council for National Policy, a shadowy organization of several hundred dues-paying members, typically meets three times a year in various locations around the country. But with the 2016 cycle accelerating, and many conservative leaders intent on rallying behind a single candidate, CNP's leadership is taking extraordinary measures – scheduling two top-priority meetings outside of Washington, D.C., and inviting a large number of non-members to both.

First of all, I love that the group is "secretive" and "shadowy" but allows outsiders in. Oh and reporters know all about them, their members and their meetings.

Moving along...

The group will host a two-day summit on May 15 and 16 at the Ritz-Carlton in Tyson's Corner, Virginia. The format will be simple: Candidates will have an hour on stage to address the room and answer questions, followed by 30 minutes of meet-and-greet with guests. Organizers say they've begun sending invitations to all of the major Republican candidates – "even Chris Christie," one said – and several candidates have already committed to the event.

Um, hold on. If the goal is to find an non-establishment candidate (which the subhead of the piece says it is but not so much in the body) who are they rallying against? Jeb? Rubio? I've asked the reporter, I'll see if there's an answer.

Anyway, put this specific group aside. The idea of "getting behind a single conservative to take on the establishment" is a long held goal. In theory. The problem is, what if *we* decide the guy to rally behind isn't one *I* can live with?

One of the main advantages "the establishment" has is they care mainly about winning. Winning means ensuring the right people have the right jobs and things run pretty much as they always have but they, instead of the Democrat establishment, hand out the goodies.

Movement conservatives and their candidate-champions on the other hand care about changing more than who sits in the seats. They want to implement actual ideas. Ideas mean disagreements.

According to this story the head of the group this time around is Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council. Other members include leaders of groups like the Club for Growth and Citizens United.

Good luck finding a candidate they both agree on.

Is it possible? Theoretically. But it will require compromise. The FRC is going to like guys like Huckabee and Santorum. Club for Growth types? Not so much.

Even if the DC conservative types can agree on say a Walker or a Cruz (the two candidates who strike me as having the best crossover potential) does that translate to people in Iowa and New Hampshire trudging through the snow to vote for "the chosen one"?

I have my doubts.

When people say, "we should rally around a single candidate" what they really mean is, "you should forget about the idiot you are supporting and vote for the guy I like."

There are too many candidates who are laying claim to too many areas that people care about. They are very unlikely to put their strongly held desires aside to make others happy. And so we will have a clown show and Jeb will win the nomination because they are disciplined and devoid of concern about anything but power.

digg this
posted by DrewM. at 12:56 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
RickZ: "[i]Youtube has a ton of video's that are suppose t ..."

Puddleglum, cheer up for the worst is yet to come: "In my case, I work mids. I'm off tonight. So, I ju ..."

Puddleglum, cheer up for the worst is yet to come: "Insomnia sucks regardless of the time. Youtube ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b]: "Morning, fellow insomaniacals! [i]What a horr ..."

JT: "Good morning Skip ! ..."

Skip: "What a horrible night for sleeping ..."

m: "330 mikeski: "My hash is 'dog gravy.' I need a dif ..."

Notorious BFD: "G'nite. y'all. Have a good day tomorrow and God bl ..."

Puddleglum, cheer up for the worst is yet to come: "https://youtu.be/5tKnAg6ZN-o?si=c1ldY31wQbbhAtyk ..."

Puddleglum, cheer up for the worst is yet to come: "https://youtu.be/dVGINIsLnqU?si=_7wtDngwC0p5mhiJ ..."

Puddleglum, cheer up for the worst is yet to come: "I sort of made it in the quotes of the week. T ..."

best mastercard casino sites: "When someone writes an piece of writing he/she mai ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64