Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info

Saturday Politics Thread: Labor Policies, Part I [Y-not] | Main | The Regulatory Leviathan [CBD]
February 14, 2015

Fundamental Concepts - Less Than Zero(sum) [Weirddave]

Someone last week requested this near the end of the fundamental concepts thread. I've never gotten a request before, but this is a good one, zero sum thinking defines one of the basic divisions between Progressive economic thought and reality. It's really quite simple.

Almost all Progressive economic theory is built upon the idea that economics is about how to divide a finite amount of resources, the analogy used is usually a pie. I like pizza better. Suppose you and I have a pizza, cut into 8 pieces, and we're splitting it. If I take 3 slices, you get 5. If I take 4 slices, I'm taking a slice from you, because you now only have 4, and so on (I get 6, 2 for you. You take 7, I'm left with 1. Et. Frickin' cetera). Progressive economics is all about how to "fairly" distribute the pizza slices. The sum of slices is finite, so we're just squabbling over their distribution.

Nonsense. If you understand free market economics even a little bit, you understand that we, you and I, may be standing over a single pizza, but we're standing in a pizzeria. The oven is hot, there's a bucket of sauce right in front of us, a zillion crusts are already rolled out on pans in the walk in box and there's a mound of shredded mozzarella cheese right over there. You want to take the entire pizza? Fine. Have it. I'll make 2 more, giving me 16 slices. If you don't like that, you'll make more pizzas, and then I'll make more, and so on and so on and so on. We're in a world of (for practical purposes) infinite resources, which gives each of us the opportunity to make as many pizzas as we want (create wealth).

Simplified: Suppose there is a village of 10 people. They're farmers, and each farmer has to grow one sheaf of wheat to make enough bread to live on. They work eight hours a day tending their farms, and each grows the sheaf of wheat needed to survive. One day, one of the farmers gets tired of the nothing but bread diet and decides to put in an extra hour of work each day planting and tending broccoli in addition to his wheat. Shortly thereafter he harvests 2 bushels of broccoli. Now, in addition to the sheaf of wheat that all the farmers have, the tenth farmer also has 2 bushels of broccoli. He's rich! And he got rich by taking advantage of his fellow farmers, right? He must have!

Nu-uh. Before the tenth farmer got entrepreneurial, the total wealth of the village was 10 sheafs of wheat. Now the wealth of the village is 10 sheafs and 2 bushels of broccoli. Where did that extra wealth come from? The tenth farmer created it out of thin air by putting in an extra hour of work each day! Seeing this, the other farmers pester him to trade wheat for his broccoli. He agrees, and splits one of his bushels of broccoli into 9 equal parts, and then trades each part to all of the other farmers for 1/9 of a sheaf of wheat each. Now we have 9 farmers with 8/9 of a sheaf of wheat and 1/9 of a bushel of broccoli, and one farmer with 2 sheafs of wheat and 1 bushel of broccoli. The wealth is distributed differently, and the tenth farmer is "rich" compared to the other farmers, but there are no losers in this scenario, because all of the transactions were voluntary (another fundamental principal of free markets). The tenth farmer has a little extra to put away against a rainy day, or to use to pay wages to a wandering man to grow even more food, or just to roll around in and say "WHEEEEEEE!". It doesn't matter. He created wealth. He grew the size of the pie. He baked another pizza.

Well sure Dave, you might say, that's a simplistic example, but we live in a world of 7 billion people, they can't all grow broccoli. Yes they can. The principle scales to infinity. Whatever it is that an individual creates, through his labor, through his imagination, through his art (it's not just physical labor that creates wealth, writing a book and selling it does the same thing, so does proposing a new theory or painting a picture), all of it is wealth created. Hell, a prostitute creates wealth. She creates a fuck that didn't exist before for a john who wants an orgasm. That fuck is worth something, and the john wants it so he pays for it with wealth he has accumulated by working an extra hour a day growing broccoli. Value is exchanged for value, through the medium of money.

It really is that simple.

Look at the world. Vast cities, sprawling farms, technological marvels, billions of cars, phones, computers and dollars. If life really is a zero sum game, where did it all come from? According to Progressive theory, none of this is possible. They'll say it was stolen from some victim or other, but follow that thought to it's logical conclusion. If the western world stole it's wealth from Africa, or from Indians, or from Whomever, than the Africans or Indians or Whomever still had to create that wealth in the first place. The fact that they could do so puts lie to the zero sum idea. The western world has removed coercion from the table, yet wealth is still being created voluntarily, by the Africans, and the Indians, and Whomever, and by the citizens of the west. Pizzas are flying off of the end of the oven's conveyer belt, and the Left is still trying to claim that those eating pizza are somehow stealing pizza from someone else. It's utter hokum.

Are you beginning to see how stupid an idea zero sum is?

digg this
posted by Open Blogger at 10:32 AM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
JackStraw: ">>N, Israel would like their technology back. ..."

The Bray, AOC: "Horse? Just biding my time. Soon the year of the d ..."

Ben Had: "N, Israel would like their technology back. ..."

Angzarr the Cromulent: "I really don't get why blacks get bent out of shap ..."

BurtTC: "The American War of Independence started on this d ..."

Gref: "Sundowner now moves like the puppeteers control hi ..."

Aetius451AD: "Anarchy communism? Posted by: Cat Ass Trophy at A ..."

Cat Ass Trophy : "Not so much from what I have seen elsewhere. Post ..."

N: ">> N, No, Bibi does not. The Abraham Accords are f ..."

[/i][/b]andycanuck (vtyCZ)[/s][/u]: "Honestly with Bari Weiss @thehonestlypod 23h R ..."

Erebus-ex-killer whale: "162 The left pretends that there are legitimate si ..."

leb: "NFL = national felons league Posted by: Deplorabl ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64