|
||
Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Recent Entries
Monday Overnight Open Thread (2/6/23)
Rocking Horse Cafe Quick Hits CBS Proudly Presents a Full-On Satanic Rite at the Grammys, and Asks You to Praise Them For Their Bravery Is Woke Disney Spooked by Proxy Fight? Biden's Deep State Defenders Put Out New Official IC Lie That Chinese Spy Airships Were Always Over the US Under Trump The Democrat Long Knives Come Out for Kamala Harris; Democrats Tell Their Newsletter The New York Times That They Have to Ditch Harris To Have Any Chance of Winning in 2024 Anthony Fauci Has Been Charging $100,000 Per Speaking Engagement So That People Can See Science In the Flesh Plus: Study Finds Ugly People Are Most Addicted to Wearing Masks Forever 7.8 Earthquake Levels Apartment Buildings in Turkey; 2,300 Reported Dead so Far in Turkey and Syria THE MORNING RANT: Throckmorton’s Razor, Minuteman’s Corollary, and the Chinese Balloon Absent Friends
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
|
« What Exactly Are We Going to Do With Neil DeGrasse Tyson? |
Main
| Good News: Huckabee Seems to be Running for President; Top Wall Street Backer Predicts Romney Will Run, Too »
September 16, 2014
Science: Networks Covered Bush's Crumbling Poll Numbers 124 Times in an Eight Month Period; In the Corresponding Eight Month Period, the Networks Covered Obama's Likewise-Crumbling Poll Numbers... Nine TimesThe dates under consideration are thus: Jan 1, 2006 to August 31, 2006 for Bush; and Both eight-month periods are located in the respective president's sixth year, in the first half of the year before the midterms. In both cases, the President's job approval rating hit lows in the low 40s.
You Had One Job, Media So why did the networks cover Bush's falling approval rating so extensively and barely mentioned Obama's? The answer is obvious and so simple that it's hardly worth the bother to write out but I don't have anywhere else to be so here goes: The media is made up of biased, interested partisans (by interested I mean they have an interest in the outcome of their reportage) but they wish to pretend not to be. If they openly campaign for their political favorites and against their political opponents (something, incidentally, they do more and more of), they are perceived as biased, and furthermore can be demonstrated as biased, by simple quotation of their own words. So instead of doing that, most of the time they choose to run stories which, while not obviously partisan on their faces, are nevertheless chosen according to partisan motivations. For example: Bush's falling polls. On its face, not partisan. Facts, after all, have no political leaning. No one can say that a fact is partisan -- without sounding like a dickish partisan himself. However, the choice to hammer Bush's poll ratings again and again is itself a partisan choice. The choice of whether to report a specific fact, or conceal it, or whether to give it Big Play, or a minor mention on page A24, is frequently a partisan decision. But the decision-making is hidden from the audience, so accusations about it are by nature speculative and cannot be proven. The media did not like Bush. They were annoyed that the public liked him. He was a Cowboy, you know. They were heartened when the public turned against him, and furthermore wished to communicate to fence-sitters that it's okay to turn on Bush, because look at how many other Americans are doing it! Thus, Bush's fall from the 50s to the 40s gets mentioned 124 times in a six month period. You can't say that the polls themselves are partisan; but you do suspect there is a motive behind the nonstop coverage of Bush's long fall. Compare to Obama's similar fall. Nine times the networks mention it. One cannot help but suspect the media does not report these polls for the same reason that I, an acknowledged partisan, don't mention polls that I don't like: because they sting me on an emotional level. I want to be an optimist, and how can I be that with Bummer Polls? In addition, of course, the same logic that leads to reporting Bush's falling polls 124 times leads to all but concealing Obama's bad polls: The media suspects that fence-sitters are amenable to the bandwagon effect, and may begin to get off the fence in the direction of the popular majority just because people do not, generally, like standing out from the crowd. (Humans are pack animals and you're safer from predators in the midst of the pack, rather than being out On Point or outriding on the flanks.) Thus, if the media reports that the American public has soured on Obama, fence-sitters may decide that they too have soured on him, and reporting Obama's bad polls may cause them to become even worse. The media greeted that possibility in the case of Bush; they dread it the case of Obama. You know, the media was very fond of reporting on Bush's Annus Horribilus (a Latin phrase meaning "swamp-ass") and its effect on his popularity. War weariness, the much-promoted civil war in Iraq, Grim Milestones, middle class wage stagnation, Katrina. You know the litany-- the press sure repeated it often enough. Obama has now had two terrible, terrible years in a row. All signs point to a third. Why no interest in that? No... journalistic interest in the interesting, important story of How Someone Who Started So High Fell Down So Very Low? And so we see the exact same story, more or less, being treated in precisely contradictory ways by a press which is an all-but-acknowledged arm of the Democrat National Committee but wishes to maintain its nominal independence for tax purposes. These things aren't complicated. Lies and corruption and hypocrisy and tribal cheerleading are pretty simple things, really. Simple and crude, and very easy to explain. Update: A love of science compels me to correct this and note that January through August is eight months, rather than "six" as I wrote, at least according the traditional, orthodox manner of counting typically favored by The Establishment. By the non-traditional, freethinking Eastern-inflected folkways I prefer, it could be any range of numbers from three to seventeen. I chose "six" as both a poetical, numinous number filled with mythic resonances and whispered truths, as well as being a good compromise figure between 3 and 17 calculated to not upset the more hidebound, numerically-orthodox minds out there in my readership. But I see now that even this minor gesture in the direction of open-mindedness and aesthetic daring is now being challenged and mocked. So, thus harassed by vicious critics, I have changed the number to the Establishment-preferred "eight." So The Establishment wins again. Quel surprise.
| Recent Comments
Cicero (@cicero43):
"This is a drunk driving ONT? Right down the center ..."
vmom stabby stabby stabby stabby stabamillion : "ONT! ..." Aetius451AD: "OH FUCKIN GEE! And Brandon had his D**K in his han ..." Blanco Basura : "Yay, ONT! ..." Braenyard, _ want nuremberg trials? badger your congressman: "Art Pepper+Eleven ..." Sandy : "Arf! ..." Aetius451AD: "Dear Lord, these people are working themselves up ..." mikeski: "[i]Tonight's ONT has been brought to you by The Li ..." OrangeEnt: "You could hide a lot of bodies there. ..." Diogenes: "Evening hordemates! ..." Nightwatch: "Well then it's time to look NORTH. To the peopl ..." All Hail Eris, Sans-Culottes (except for the Book Thread): "*dances hornpipe* ..." Recent Entries
Monday Overnight Open Thread (2/6/23)
Rocking Horse Cafe Quick Hits CBS Proudly Presents a Full-On Satanic Rite at the Grammys, and Asks You to Praise Them For Their Bravery Is Woke Disney Spooked by Proxy Fight? Biden's Deep State Defenders Put Out New Official IC Lie That Chinese Spy Airships Were Always Over the US Under Trump The Democrat Long Knives Come Out for Kamala Harris; Democrats Tell Their Newsletter The New York Times That They Have to Ditch Harris To Have Any Chance of Winning in 2024 Anthony Fauci Has Been Charging $100,000 Per Speaking Engagement So That People Can See Science In the Flesh Plus: Study Finds Ugly People Are Most Addicted to Wearing Masks Forever 7.8 Earthquake Levels Apartment Buildings in Turkey; 2,300 Reported Dead so Far in Turkey and Syria THE MORNING RANT: Throckmorton’s Razor, Minuteman’s Corollary, and the Chinese Balloon Search
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) |