Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Dutch Group Creates Virtual 10-Year-Old Pedophile Lure Named "Sweetie;"
Group ID's 1000 Pedophiles by Name (So Far) And Forwards Their Information to Law Enforcement
| Main | Shock: Obama, Biden Stop Mentioning Obamacare in Speeches; Obama Hopes to, Get This, Pivot to a Different Subject
November 04, 2013 what to expect next [Fritzworth]

[added a few more links & minor edits]

Ace has been kind enough to let me post links over in Headlines to my series of posts on the unraveling IT fiasco, I figured I owed him an original post here at Ace of Spades.

As a software architect, team leader, enterprise IT consultant, and expert witness, I have been studying and explaining why IT projects succeed or (more commonly) fail for nearly 20 years. The factors for failure are remarkably consistent, as is the path that failing IT projects typically take. In one sense, it make my job easier, since a relatively simple checklist can usually uncover the fundamental issues. On the other hand, I find that clients -- when I review projects that are still alive (vs. those already in litigation) -- often don't want to hear what I have to say. Gets a bit depressing at times, but there you go.

So, let's look at all the failure factors that have been revealed so far in the debacle.

I could provide links to all these, but lots of people have been doing that for us, so I'll just summarize:

[0] A badly-written law, based on unsustainable economic assumptions, multipiled into 11,000+ pages of regulations. (Ashton's Law)
[1] The wrong people and organizations.
[2] The wrong organizational structure (Conway's Law).
[3] Changing and politically deferred requirements.
[4] A big bang approach (instead of an evolutionary one) (Gall's Law).
[5] Trying to fit "five years of development into two years".
[6] Doing an incredible poor and late job on software quality assurance, including (but not limited to) testing.
[7] Going live before the system was ready.
[8] Trying to fix the system while keeping it (mostly) up and (mostly) running.
[9] Adding manpower to a late project (Brooks' Law).

It is hard under the best of circumstances to bring a massive IT project to a successful launch (mostly on-time, mostly on-budget); making all these errors along the way made failure inevitable. I'm sure there are plenty more than these, but these are more than enough to kill a project.

Most of the failed IT projects I've examined (between 150 and 200) have been after-the-fact, when the matter has gone into litigation. I have reviewed hundreds of thousands of pages of documents (and done directed searches on millions of pages), tracing the history of the projects and attempting to identify where things went wrong.

So, what can you expect next?

There are two basic courses that a project such as this takes at this point: oscillation or off-line.

Oscillation is what happens when the developer continues to push ahead, attempting to fix/stabilize a live system. The system may improve marginally, but then new problems are uncovered and/or introduced by the on-going changes. I have seen projects go like this for months, with the essential fixes perpetually 4 to 8 weeks away, and the system never really behaving acceptably.

Off-line is the wiser move. The system is taken down for the time being, and an effort is made to make it acceptable.

At this point, those who are wise will insist on more, not less, time for development and more, not less, time and resources for software quality assurance, including testing. They may even recommend pulling the plug altogether, or at least going back to something close to the start.

Such people are rarely heeded, because their news is invariably bad and usually unacceptable to the Powers That Be. The temptation will exist to instead use short-cuts and quick fixes to rush it back into production -- and at that point, you almost always are back to the oscillation/off-line decision again.

Now. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI) gave Obama lots of cover on the Sunday talk shows by recommending that be taken down for an extended period (Rogers said six months) until at least the security problems are worked out.

I'm not sure that's going to happen, at least not yet. At the least, I think that the effort will push ahead until Thanksgiving weekend (end of November, remember?), and then they will go off-line, burying the news on the ultimate Friday-for-news-dumps.

At that point, they will have two choices: try to fix the existing systems (or major sections thereof), or start a new, highly simplified system from scratch, with manual support, and they slowly graft it into the necessary back-end systems. This will take months; frankly, it could actually take a year or two.

If, however, they do not pull the plug then (or before then), then expect to see the oscillation continue: some modest improvements, accompanied by a rash of new problems (or old ones resurfacing). Usage numbers for the website will steadily drop -- actual non-Medicaid enrollment will continue to be very low -- and the Administration with its enablers and flacks will continue to try to find a way to blame this disaster on anyone but themselves. Ultimately, the site will either persist in low functionality or will be halted altogether.

The key lesson is this: there is no royal road to software. Good intentions, noble causes, and political fervor count for nothing; if anything, they may undermine the project by causing those involved to accept or even demand short-cuts and shoddy workmanship "in a good cause" -- which is how the Obama Administration got into this mess in the first place.

Obligatory disclaimer: all my observations are 2nd, 3rd, or 4th hand. In a situation like this, I would normally come in and spend weeks (or, in some cases, months) interviewing people, reviewing deliverables, and examining the system under development to see just what the core problems are and how likely they are to be fixable. Here's a redacted example of one such review (actually, my third review of this same project in three years); you can see how many of the issues noted have also come out about the development effort.

So, is there a chance that between now and the end of the month, the "tech surge" will make a few key changes and magically fix the website?

Nah. I don't think so. It's a much greater likelihood that instead they'll build a very simple data collection web front end and eliminate the on-line plan comparison and enrollment, then declare victory and go home. Then all the Administration flacks will talk about how this is almost as good.

But if they're smart, they'll just take the site down indefinitely and find some magic way to postpone the individual mandate.

We'll see. ..fritz..

P.S. Here are my other Obamacare IT posts, almost all of which have shown up in the Headlines column.

digg this
posted by Open Blogger at 05:54 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
anchorbabe fashion cop: "Esther Williams had a nice set of gams. Some mo ..."

Thomas Bender: "@1182 >>What happened to Grrrrl power ? I ca ..."

It's me donna : "My prediction.. If the polls come out showing Kama ..."

Mister Scott (Formerly GWS): "Biden's brain is collapsing so fast he would be th ..."

Cat Ass Trophy : "Biden has to get a $10 million government funded r ..."

Eromero: "1146 What pisses me off the most is that mushbrain ..."

sock_rat_eez - they have been lying to us for decades[/i][/s][/b][/u]: "@1192, lol, yeah, probably about right ..."

Sharon(willow's apprentice): "1163 All 4 are white men. Lol ..."

Chuck Martel: "Globalists infecting the see eye ayyy orchestrated ..."

BetaCuck4Lyfe: "1163 @1138 >>-Arizona Senator Mark Kelly -Kent ..."

Blonde Morticia: " Republicans against Trump ============= ak ..."

Mr Aspirin Factory, deplorable clown: "Kumdumpser and Bootyjuice. Posted by: Cat Ass Tro ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64