Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« Thursday Morning News Dump | Main | Failed President Somehow Clings to 43% Support, With 49% Opposing »
September 26, 2013

Red light cameras - for safety or revenue?

Some random clicking led me to this NPR piece on red light cameras which was interesting.

What's the point of a red-light camera — to make intersections safer or to generate revenue? That's the question prompted by researchers at the University of Tennessee, who say the cameras are sometimes used in ways that are more likely to make money than to improve safety.
Real shocker that something sold to the public for "safety" would be perverted into a revenue maker that might actually compromise safety, right?

OK, you're done rolling your eyes now I suppose...moving on...

In their research, Han and his colleagues explored what they call "dual, conflicting purposes" in the system: The more effective a camera is at making an intersection safe, the less profitable — and self-supporting — it becomes.
Naturally, when revenues decline, action is called for.
Han says some city and county governments have gone through "gyrations" to keep their red-light cameras operating.

"Some increased fines from $50 to $100 per offense," he says. "Some play with traffic signals to get more incidences of red-light running. Some added speed enforcement to the red-light camera program over time."

When people obeying the law and driving safely proves inconvenient, just make sure more people break the law - revenue restored!
For instance, cutting the duration of a yellow light by one second — from four seconds to three, for example — results in a higher frequency of drivers running a red light — as high as 110 percent, according to the study.
And if jacking the Yellow times down isn't producing enough violators, they have some other tricks up their sleeve as well.
And if the speed limit around an intersection goes up, drivers are more likely to be caught in the "dilemma zone" — where they must quickly consider their options, and have less room to stop comfortably. According to one report in the study, raising the limit by 10 mph makes it 45 percent more likely that drivers will run the light.
And if goosing the speed limits up ain't good enough, there's even more "safety enhancement" things they'll do to help make sure you violate.
Another strategy that was reported in the Tennessee paper but not closely studied is the practice of municipalities removing signs warning drivers of an upcoming signal.
So what's a reasonable yellow light duration in practice out on the streets under real life conditions?

Assume a typical recognition/react time of about 1sec. You see the green switch to yellow, decide you won't make it through on yellow, and then start flailing various appendages needed to start the braking process. 1sec for this process start to finish is about right...

...but you still gotta actually stop the vehicle. That 1sec "latency" just got your foot off the gas pedal and onto the brake pedal, you haven't decelerated yet.

There's a table here that will allow you to calculate stopping TIME.

the average driver can safely decelerate an automobile or light truck with reasonably good tires at the rate of about 15 feet per second (fps). That is, a driver can slow down at this rate without anticipated probability that control of the vehicle will be lost in the process.
If we use that "typical" 15 feet per second figure, and assume a speed of say 50mph (a typical speed limit on US 441 in my south FL area), the table says you're moving at 73.3 feet/sec at 50mph.

Using the 15' per second metric, that means you can bring the vehicle to a complete stop in 73.3/15 seconds, which is ~4.9sec once you are ON THE BRAKES. Add to that 4.9sec a standard 1sec latency and you're looking at a recognize/react/stop time of just under 6sec. If your ride is a 5,000lb 1970's gas guzzler hooptie bondo-buggy covered in Wisconsin chrome (i.e dust tape) with bad brakes, bald tires and the road is kinda wet, you may want to extend that 6sec just a tad.

How many yellow lights do you see on 50mph roads, with stop light cameras, with a 6 sec Yellow timing? Yea, not many. Damn few. Vanishingly close to zero. As a practical matter, you got a better chance of spotting Elvis in a 7-11.

Mitigating treacherous villainy designed to
ensnare you and manufacture criminals

Here's what I do -- I look ahead for upcoming stop lights and ease off the gas a bit when approaching them. If you're being tailgated, which is often, this may prompt the tailgater to pass you and zoom ahead into the waiting red light trap. That removes your risk of being rear-ended if the light starts changing.

Having a car or two in front of you at a red light isn't a bad thing either; it means THEY, not you, will likely be the ones to get T-boned when someone cruises a red light coming the other way. I always like it when I can have someone else, test the waters before I jump in.

In many areas, during off-peak hours lights are synchronized so that a vehicle traveling at some particular speed almost never gets one. ex. I can go the 10mi from home to PBI on surface streets at 40mph in the middle of the night passing through dozens of lights and catch maybe only one or two. Go the posted speed limits and I'd be catching 50% or more of them. That's something you can only learn by experience in an area and trial and error.

Here's a link to the research paper NPR mentions. There's a number of interesting graphs there.

You're not being paranoid when
they really are out to get you.

digg this
posted by Purp at 10:50 AM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Hokey Pokey: ""Watch out, you might get what you're after." Bec ..."

[/i][/s][/b][/u]blaster: "[i]Reddit shit-posters make Google dumbfucks look ..."

Warai-otoko: "To be at least a little serious for a moment.... i ..."

BruceWayne: "I thought that dog had been removed quite awhile a ..."

SturmToddler: "Social media platform Reddit has struck a deal wit ..."

wth: "brainwashing > Google Gemini ..."

Commissar of Plenty and Lysenkoism in Solidarity with the Struggle to maintain Moron standards : "The trial for the armorer for the Baldwin movie is ..."

FenelonSpoke: "I have a feeling that even people who are literate ..."

Emmie: "[i]64 OT: one of commander's attacks left the WH c ..."

Our Country is Screwed: "what does that mean? I've heard Nvidia being discu ..."

BurtTC: "I used to work with a woman who looked a lot, in e ..."

RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "[i]Never would have thought "Skynet" would be woke ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64