Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« Of Course: Obama to Give Capitol Hill Staffers an ObamaCare Waiver | Main | Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos Personally Buys Washington Post For 250 Million Doll Hairs;
Wait, I Mean Dollars »
August 05, 2013

Here They Come Again: The Internet Gun Sales "Loophole"


You can't even get through the first paragraph of the piece of crap WaPo piece linked above without getting bombarded with lies, but I'll fisk a little of it anyway.

First, let's set the stage. All purchases of guns from or through federally licensed firearms dealers (FFLs) are subject to the Brady Act, which established the background check requirement (Note: a permit is allowed to substitute for a NICS check in certain states). All of them.

And the BATFE provides the following helpful tidbit about interstate private sales in language so plain even a reporter should be able to understand it: "Please note that if a private person wants to obtain a firearm from a private person who resides in another State, the firearm will have to be shipped to an FFL in the buyer’s State. The FFL will be responsible for record keeping."

Private sales between individuals residing in the same state do not require a background check. The left's rallying cry against all such sales used to be "gun show loophole", regardless of where the sale actually took place, but since that didn't work, it looks like it's time to try "Internet loophole".

So, on to the first graf ...

The marketplace for firearms on the Internet, where buyers are not required to undergo background checks, is so vast that advocates for stricter regulations now consider online sales a greater threat than the gun show loophole.

Oh, my aching head. If you buy from an FFL or out-of-state seller over the Internet, you have to undergo a background check. If you buy from an in-state private seller, you don't. How f'ing hard is this?

More help from BATFE: "A person may only acquire a firearm within the person’s own State, except that he or she may purchase or otherwise acquire a rifle or shotgun, in person, at a licensee’s premises in any State, provided the sale complies with State laws applicable in the State of sale and the State where the purchaser resides."

A new study by Third Way , a centrist think tank with close ties to the Obama administration ...

Hahahahaha. Centrist. Is there really any reason to read on?

Hell, even Politico's dutiful recitation of the "study" results called the group "left-leaning".

The study focused on — a popular classified site similar to that facilitates private sales of firearms ...

Study of ad listings for private sales of firearms, some of which aren't subject to background checks, shockingly concludes some firearms are being sold without background checks.

... and ammunition based on location — and analyzed listings in 10 states where senators voted against a background checks compromise this spring.

At any given time, more than 15,000 guns were for sale in those states, according to the study, and more than 5,000 of them were semi-automatic weapons.

There are, what, 200 million guns in the U.S.? And semi-automatic firearms have been mass-produced for over a century. Sounds like a really huge problem we're talking about here.

Nearly 2,000 ads were from prospective buyers asking to buy specifically from private sellers, where no background checks are required.

As we've established, it's impossible to know whether a background check would be required based on this information alone; the location of the buyer and seller are critical factors. But are there any other reasons one might want to buy from a private seller? Avoiding the dealer markup and sales taxes are two that quickly spring to mind. Oh, also, it's illegal for a private seller to sell a gun to anyone they know or suspect to be disqualified from owning one (scroll down to "(d) It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammunition ...").

“At this point, this is the biggest loophole in the background check system,” said Lanae Erickson Hatalsky, director of social policy and politics at Third Way.

And there's the helpful political framing for WaPo's policy position statement disguised as news.

Background checks — designed to keep guns out of the hands of convicted felons, domestic violence perpetrators or the severely mentally ill — are mandatory for gun sales at retail stores, but not at gun shows ...

Once again, background checks are required for gun show sales by an FFL (or by an individual to a resident of another state through an FFL).

... or for private sales, such as between neighbors and family members.

This one's rich ... they picked a subset of private sales that would largely be conducted in-state through personal contact (where you're very likely to know if the prospective buyer is a disqualified person) as examples supporting their broad (read "incorrect") statement that all private sales are exempt from background checks ... in an article about the "Internet loophole".

The piece goes on like this, conveniently obscuring the fact that a single subset of gun sales - intrastate private sales - isn't subject to Federal background check laws.

And then comes the state law aspect. They mention that 17 states have "closed the gun show loophole" while strongly implying that zero states have closed this newer, deadlier, "Internet loophole" when they're the same damned thing.

Meanwhile, as a resident of the People's Republic of Massachusetts, I have to document all private sales of firearms (of which I may perform four per year) and make sure they're to a lawful purchaser who, by virtue of the fact that I'm required to file his FID/LTC number on the transfer form, has undergone a background check and has not subsequently become disqualified.

But, hey, never let facts get in the way of a good story when you have guns to ban.

Related: Why Gun Owners Are Right to Fight Against Gun Control: The anti-gun crowd doesn't want "compromise." They want confiscation and control.

digg this
posted by Andy at 04:47 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Count de Monet: "Buenas Nachos! ..."

Moron Robbie - Until scrubbed docs show other it's safe to assume the antifa shooter was a tranny: "Ardy ran bonhomme of because of his religion why d ..."

Oedipus: "Dude, was this a clean first shot by Ace? I don't ..."

Eye Socket is a DNA Cup Holder: "561 Where is Dan Crenshaw? Posted by: Soothsayer ..."

ALH: "Yabba Dabba Do! ..."

OrangeEnt: "Is that Chicago on fire in the far background, Mis ..."

AlaBAMA: "Man has 11 children! ..."

Anonymous Rogue in Kalifornistan (ARiK): "Thank you for ONT Mis Hum. Great pic up top. Are ..."

Scarlett O'Hara : "What a night of powerful personal stories. ..."

ALH: "Top 10 ..."

AlaBAMA: "WWII vet from Wisconsin! ..."

Ciampino - Wed Update #01: "The link for Quote II gave me a 404 error. ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64