Ace: aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
On Fox. Apparently he's already burned a strawman.
He claimed that when he was speaking a few weeks ago about striking the proper balance in the war on terror he meant this. Implication: I sorta did tell you about it, you know.
Then he proceeds to swipe at the right for being interested in this, saying that we we weren't interested in it five years ago, and that it's "mature" that we now are.
He meant to leave but someone asked a question and he stayed to answer it. The question was about leaks. He's now gone off on a tangent, effectively blaming Congress, saying they are "fully briefed" and "empowered" to object if there's anything objectionable.
In fact that's false. As Glenn Greenwald noted the other night, Congress may be "briefed" but they're also not permitted to reveal anything they're briefed about. He had a good word for it, which I sadly forget, striking at the idea that they are involuntarily conscripted into being false supporters in such things, as they do not, in fact, have any liberty to discuss it or object openly.
Senator Ron Wyden made this point a few weeks ago.